Re: [openssl-users] libssl.so.1.0.0 -> Java1.6 net.ssl gives: dh key too small:s3_clnt.c:3617:

2016-08-25 Thread Porter, Andrew
: [openssl-users] libssl.so.1.0.0 -> Java1.6 net.ssl gives: dh key too small:s3_clnt.c:3617: Hello, We have a C written OpenSSL application which talks to a server written in Java1.6. The client side (i.e. OpenSSL) rejects connecting with the error: 25.08.2016-10:58:06 Error - SSL_connect()

Re: [openssl-users] libssl.so.1.0.0 -> Java1.6 net.ssl gives: dh key too small:s3_clnt.c:3617:

2016-08-25 Thread Jakob Bohm
On 25/08/2016 16:21, Matthias Apitz wrote: Hello, We have a C written OpenSSL application which talks to a server written in Java1.6. The client side (i.e. OpenSSL) rejects connecting with the error: 25.08.2016-10:58:06 Error - SSL_connect() returned:<-1> - connection failed 25.08.2016-10:58:06

[openssl-users] libssl.so.1.0.0 -> Java1.6 net.ssl gives: dh key too small:s3_clnt.c:3617:

2016-08-25 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, We have a C written OpenSSL application which talks to a server written in Java1.6. The client side (i.e. OpenSSL) rejects connecting with the error: 25.08.2016-10:58:06 Error - SSL_connect() returned:<-1> - connection failed 25.08.2016-10:58:06 SSL_get_error() returned SSL_ERROR_SSL, ER

Re: [openssl-users] libssl.so.1.0.0

2016-01-12 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:03:42PM -0500, Jeff Archer wrote: > I am building from source that came from openssl-1.0.2e.tar.gz but it > appears to be producing output of libssl.so.1.0.0. Is this what I should > expect? Yes. That is the correct soname for all 1.0.X releases. Kurt __

[openssl-users] libssl.so.1.0.0

2016-01-12 Thread Jeff Archer
I am building from source that came from openssl-1.0.2e.tar.gz but it appears to be producing output of libssl.so.1.0.0. Is this what I should expect? Jeff Archer jeffarch...@gmail.com ___ openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl