Re: [openssl-users] Vulnerability Disclosures

2015-07-12 Thread Richard Moore
On 12 July 2015 at 03:31, Salz, Rich wrote: > I'd be concerned about doing that. While this one seemed pretty rare -- > only folks running a release less than 30 days old in production -- as a > general rule, it's impossible to tell. For example, we THINK that PSK > isn't used much, but we have

Re: [openssl-users] Vulnerability Disclosures

2015-07-11 Thread Salz, Rich
> > I wanted to suggest that when notifying of new vulnerabilities, in addition > to the severity level, information is also provided about how widespread the > issue is expected to be. I'd be concerned about doing that. While this one seemed pretty rare -- only folks running a release less tha

Re: [openssl-users] Vulnerability Disclosures

2015-07-11 Thread Jeffrey Walton
> I wanted to suggest that when notifying of new vulnerabilities, in addition > to the severity level, information is also provided about how widespread the > issue is expected to be. > > For example, the statement might say "this high severity bug is expected to > affect around 70% of cases”, o

[openssl-users] Vulnerability Disclosures

2015-07-10 Thread James Billingham
Hi, I apologize if this is the wrong place for this email - it seemed to be the most suitable of the mailing lists. I wanted to suggest that when notifying of new vulnerabilities, in addition to the severity level, information is also provided about how widespread the issue is expected to be.