On 1/27/2016 07:56, Nulik Nol wrote:
> Hi,
> I have to implement SSL/TLS in a proprietary web server daemon. I am
> only familiar with SSL as a user, not as developer, so my question is.
> What versions of SSL should I support for best compatibility and
> optimal development time? How much old brow
> On Jan 27, 2016, at 8:56 AM, Nulik Nol wrote:
>
> How much old browsers are out there that
> still use older SSL versions? Because, Wikipedia says SSL 3.0 was
> deprecated by Jun 2015 but if I only implement TLS, I may lose many
> visitors with old browsers, right ?
You do not have to enable
Thanks for the link!
This says it all:
" o Implementations MUST NOT negotiate SSL version 2.
Rationale: Today, SSLv2 is considered insecure [RFC6176].
o Implementations MUST NOT negotiate SSL version 3.
Rationale: SSLv3 [RFC6101] was an improvement over SSLv2 and
plugged so
Hi,
I have to implement SSL/TLS in a proprietary web server daemon. I am
only familiar with SSL as a user, not as developer, so my question is.
What versions of SSL should I support for best compatibility and
optimal development time? How much old browsers are out there that
still use older SSL ver