Thanks
On 4/5/18, 2:35 PM, "openssl-users on behalf of Viktor Dukhovni"
wrote:
> On Apr 5, 2018, at 2:29 PM, Henderson, Karl via openssl-users
wrote:
>
>> TLS 1.3 unifies session tickets with (external) PSKs, perhaps you should
recast your approach in terms of PSKs r
> On Apr 5, 2018, at 2:29 PM, Henderson, Karl via openssl-users
> wrote:
>
>> TLS 1.3 unifies session tickets with (external) PSKs, perhaps you should
>> recast your approach in terms of PSKs rather than session tickets.
>
> Is there a good implementation example of this?
I think you'd be t
Thanks,
> TLS 1.3 unifies session tickets with (external) PSKs, perhaps you should
> recast your approach in terms of PSKs rather than session tickets.
Is there a good implementation example of this?
On 4/5/18, 2:19 PM, "openssl-users on behalf of Viktor Dukhovni"
wrote:
> On
> On Apr 5, 2018, at 2:02 PM, Henderson, Karl via openssl-users
> wrote:
>
> Is it possible to use 5077 with a key wrapping key in a Needham-Schroeder
> scenario:
>
> • A is a Key Server
> • C is say a web server
> • A has a relationship with C and hence A has key KEYac
>
Is it possible to use 5077 with a key wrapping key in a Needham-Schroeder
scenario:
* A is a Key Server
* C is say a web server
* A has a relationship with C and hence A has key KEYac
* B wants to talk to C but doesn’t have a relationship with C
* B has a relationship with A
