Re: [openssl-users] Openssl asynchronous operation in real network

2019-01-15 Thread Ananthu Unnikrishnan
Hi Matt, Thanks for your update. Will try to implement one scheme using the same. I have one doubt regarding the points which we have discussed earlier. I am now facing an issue of getting an invalid waitctx address while trying to get it using ASYNC_get_wait_ctx(). I hav

Re: [openssl-users] Openssl asynchronous operation in real network

2019-01-14 Thread Matt Caswell
On 13/01/2019 04:36, Ananthu Unnikrishnan wrote: > Hi Matt, > >             Thanks a lot for the response. The alternative method to resume > job > operation is a good one.  >               >             I need some more clarifications regarding the async job operation. > Please help. >    

Re: [openssl-users] Openssl asynchronous operation in real network

2019-01-12 Thread Ananthu Unnikrishnan
Hi Matt, Thanks a lot for the response. The alternative method to resume job operation is a good one. I need some more clarifications regarding the async job operation. Please help. In ssl/ss_lib.c, ssl_start_async_job() function found. In which ASYNC_start_job

Re: [openssl-users] Openssl asynchronous operation in real network

2019-01-11 Thread Matt Caswell
On 10/01/2019 18:09, Ananthu Unnikrishnan wrote: > Hi Matt, > >     Thanks a lot for the reply. > >    After calling ASYNC_pause_job() from the engine, control will transfer > to > the place where we start the ASYNC_start_job right? So how can we write the > code > to put a trigger on

Re: [openssl-users] Openssl asynchronous operation in real network

2019-01-10 Thread Ananthu Unnikrishnan
Hi Matt, Thanks a lot for the reply. After calling ASYNC_pause_job() from the engine, control will transfer to the place where we start the ASYNC_start_job right? So how can we write the code to put a trigger on fd in the same thread? If I am wrong please correct me. Also if u can

Re: [openssl-users] Openssl asynchronous operation in real network

2019-01-10 Thread Matt Caswell
On 10/01/2019 09:39, Ananthu Unnikrishnan wrote: > Hi all, > >         We are not able to access the waitctx address from the job address > using > ASYNC_get_wait_ctx(job) from a thread which starts in the bind section of the > dynamic engine. The job address is the same as that we got > using 

Re: [openssl-users] Openssl asynchronous operation in real network

2019-01-10 Thread Ananthu Unnikrishnan
Hi all, We are not able to access the waitctx address from the job address using ASYNC_get_wait_ctx(job) from a thread which starts in the bind section of the dynamic engine. The job address is the same as that we got using ASYNC_get_current_job. Can anyone help on this? On Tue, Jan 8,

Re: [openssl-users] Openssl asynchronous operation in real network

2019-01-07 Thread Ananthu Unnikrishnan
Can anyone please help on this? If u need any additional information please let me know. On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:25 PM Ananthu Unnikrishnan wrote: > Hi all, > > Adding more details to the previous mail. We have edited the OpenSSL code > for implementing the polling for changed fd's as in OpenSS

Re: [openssl-users] Openssl asynchronous operation in real network

2019-01-07 Thread Ananthu Unnikrishnan
Hi all, Adding more details to the previous mail. We have edited the OpenSSL code for implementing the polling for changed fd's as in OpenSSL speed command. Attached the code snippet of the same along with this mail. Mentioned below some observations which found doubtful: 1) We have got prints in

[openssl-users] Openssl asynchronous operation in real network

2019-01-05 Thread Ananthu Unnikrishnan
Hi all, We have implemented a dynamic engine and tested in the async mode using OpenSSL speed command. But in a real network scenario, we have seen only starting the async_job(in file ssl/ssl_lib.c, function: ssl_start_async_job) in the OpenSSL. We haven't seen polling async_fd's for resumi