Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL version 1.1.0 pre release 6 published

2016-08-04 Thread Jakob Bohm
On 05/08/2016 04:51, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:33:25AM +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote: I haven't read that proposal, but if the HTTPS server has to use the same host name as the SMTPS server, then the SMTPS server could just use the certificate directly. There is at best a ver

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL version 1.1.0 pre release 6 published

2016-08-04 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:33:25AM +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote: > I haven't read that proposal, but if the HTTPS server has to use the > same host name as the SMTPS server, then the SMTPS server could just > use the certificate directly. There is at best a very tenuous analogy between TLS for HTTP an

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL version 1.1.0 pre release 6 published

2016-08-04 Thread Jakob Bohm
On 05/08/2016 01:48, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:30:39PM -0700, Carl Byington wrote: Have you seen the mta-sts proposal: Of course. But mta-sts starts with an unauthenticated dns TXT record. Yes, this is but one of its compromises. If that proposal is worth anything,

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL version 1.1.0 pre release 6 published

2016-08-04 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:30:39PM -0700, Carl Byington wrote: > Have you seen the mta-sts proposal: Of course. > But mta-sts starts with an unauthenticated dns TXT record. Yes, this is but one of its compromises. > If that proposal is worth anything, it indicates there is some use for a > mec

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL version 1.1.0 pre release 6 published

2016-08-04 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 22:33 +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > Such configurations will be rather rare, and offer minimal incremental > MITM protection. The code and documentation to support this use-case > and explain it to users are not worth the tr

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL version 1.1.0 pre release 6 published

2016-08-04 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 03:05:00PM -0700, Carl Byington wrote: > > OpenSSL version 1.1.0 pre release 6 (beta) > > Seems to work in my openssl/sendmail/dane test environment. Thanks for the confirmation. > http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/blog/dane Note, I still firmly hold that the "o DANE=

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL version 1.1.0 pre release 6 published

2016-08-04 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 > OpenSSL version 1.1.0 pre release 6 (beta) Seems to work in my openssl/sendmail/dane test environment. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/blog/dane -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREKAAYFAleju/sACgkQL6j7

[openssl-users] OpenSSL version 1.1.0 pre release 6 published

2016-08-04 Thread OpenSSL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OpenSSL version 1.1.0 pre release 6 (beta) === OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS https://www.openssl.org/ OpenSSL 1.1.0 is currently in beta. OpenSSL 1.1.0 pre release 6 has now b