> On Sep 18, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
> That depends on whether setting the cert_store element was done properly (in
> a way
> that incremented the reference count) or not. See the documentation of:
>
> SSL_CTX_set1_cert_store(3)
> SSL_CTX_set_cert_store(3)
> On Sep 18, 2018, at 12:30 PM, Maxwell Dreytser wrote:
>
>> X509_STORE_free() decrements a reference count, and frees the object only
>> when the count reaches zero.
>>
> Was this behavior the same in older versions?
Yes.
> If so, then there is no reason to clear cert_store even in older vers
> On Sep 18, 2018, at 12:12 PM, ad...@mdtech.us wrote:
>
> I have some legacy code that I am updating for 1.1 and there they set
> SSL_CTX::cert_store to NULL before `SSL_CTX_free`. Is this neccessary for the
> X509_STORE to be shared between contexts?
> Note that this still has to be buildab
Hello,
I have some legacy code that I am updating for 1.1 and there they set
SSL_CTX::cert_store to NULL before `SSL_CTX_free`. Is this neccessary
for the X509_STORE to be shared between contexts?
Note that this still has to be buildable on 1.0 with the same result.
In the docs it says "X509_S
