Re: [openssl-users] Increasing the server write buffer for handshakes in 1.1.0

2016-11-14 Thread Matt Caswell
On 14/11/16 13:37, Brandon Black wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Matt Caswell wrote: >> During the handshake phase OpenSSL adds a buffering BIO in front of the >> wbio. However when you call SSL_get_wbio(), you get back the *real* wbio >> (without the bbio on the front). This is a cha

Re: [openssl-users] Increasing the server write buffer for handshakes in 1.1.0

2016-11-14 Thread Brandon Black
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Matt Caswell wrote: > During the handshake phase OpenSSL adds a buffering BIO in front of the > wbio. However when you call SSL_get_wbio(), you get back the *real* wbio > (without the bbio on the front). This is a change of behaviour between > 1.1.0 and 1.0.2, and

Re: [openssl-users] Increasing the server write buffer for handshakes in 1.1.0

2016-11-14 Thread Matt Caswell
On 12/11/16 16:29, Brandon Black wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm running into an issue where if the server handshake response > exceeds some value a little over 4K (which is pretty easy these days > with a typical public cert, intermediate, and stapled OCSP response), > we're suffering an extra RTT i

[openssl-users] Increasing the server write buffer for handshakes in 1.1.0

2016-11-12 Thread Brandon Black
Hi all, I'm running into an issue where if the server handshake response exceeds some value a little over 4K (which is pretty easy these days with a typical public cert, intermediate, and stapled OCSP response), we're suffering an extra RTT in our SSL negotiations with OpenSSL-1.1.0 (vs 1.0.2).