> From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Jaya Nageswar
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 02:36
> ... the output [is] different between openssl 0.9.8 and 1.0.1x versions as
> the following methods
> are being used in the code flow for the method PEM_write_bio_PrivateKey.
> 1.0.1x - PEM_write_bio_PKCS8
Hi Dave,
Thank you very much for a prompt response. I very much appreciate your
inputs. I have a couple of follow up questions.
You mentioned that the output would be different between openssl 0.9.8 and
1.0.1x versions as the following methods are being used in the code flow
for the method PEM_wr
On 22/12/2014 13:57, Dave Thompson wrote:
At least for now; there is another thread started just a few days ago
about all PEM formats used by OpenSSL suggesting the traditional
privatekey forms are obsolete and maybe should be deleted!
Please don't do that until 5+ years after 0.9.8 end-of-life
> From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Jaya Nageswar
> Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 05:51
> In our application, we have been using openssl 0.9.8 and trying to move to
> openssl 1.0.1x as 0.9.8 is going to be EOS by December 2015. We have a
> sample application where we try to read a sample pem k
Dear openssl community,
In our application, we have been using openssl 0.9.8 and trying to move to
openssl 1.0.1x as 0.9.8 is going to be EOS by December 2015. We have a
sample application where we try to read a sample pem key file, create an
EVP_PKEY indirectly using PEM_read_bio_PrivateKey(B
