* Please let me know if we have any update on this.
This is a volunteer effort. :)
My *GUESS* is that the CRL data isn’t sorted, and it’s doing a linear search.
You should profile the code to find out where, exactly, all the time is being
spent.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe
Hello,
Please let me know if we have any update on this.
With Regards,
Prateep
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 2:26 PM Prateep Kumar
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are converting a *CRL* (Size *3.687 MB*) to binary data using
> *X509_CRL_get_REVOKED()* and it is taking *167.977* seconds to process
> the same.
Hello,
We are converting a *CRL* (Size *3.687 MB*) to binary data using
*X509_CRL_get_REVOKED()* and it is taking *167.977* seconds to process the
same.
Please let us know if this is an expected behavior or something should be
done to improve the above observation.
With Regards,
Prateep
--
open
