Re: [openssl-users] Building libcrypto/libssl without symbolic link

2015-04-22 Thread Jakob Bohm
On 22/04/2015 21:49, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 09:04:04PM +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote: For parallel installation of OpenSSL 1.0.2a and the OS supplied OpenSSL 1.0.1 (with patches equivalent to the latest release), modify SHLIB_VERSION_NUMBER from 1.0.0 to 1.0.2 in the folliwing

Re: [openssl-users] Building libcrypto/libssl without symbolic link

2015-04-22 Thread h15234
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015, at 12:49 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > Applications using a non-system library need to record a suitable > RPATH (often using "$ORIGIN" is a good bet if the application ships > a copy of the library). Ideally applications would use the system > supplied library, otherwise patc

Re: [openssl-users] Building libcrypto/libssl without symbolic link

2015-04-22 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 09:04:04PM +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote: > For parallel installation of OpenSSL 1.0.2a and the OS > supplied OpenSSL 1.0.1 (with patches equivalent to the > latest release), modify SHLIB_VERSION_NUMBER from 1.0.0 > to 1.0.2 in the folliwing files from the tarball: The ABI versi

Re: [openssl-users] Building libcrypto/libssl without symbolic link

2015-04-22 Thread Jakob Bohm
ssage - From: Viktor Dukhovni To: openssl-users@openssl.org Cc: Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 11:47 PM Subject: Re: [openssl-users] Building libcrypto/libssl without symbolic link On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:12:45AM +, Shanku Roy wrote: lrw-r--r-- root root 2015

Re: [openssl-users] Building libcrypto/libssl without symbolic link

2015-04-22 Thread John Foley
rom: Viktor Dukhovni > To: openssl-users@openssl.org > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 11:47 PM > Subject: Re: [openssl-users] Building libcrypto/libssl without symbolic link > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:12:45AM +, Shanku Roy wrote: >> lrw-r--r-- root root

Re: [openssl-users] Building libcrypto/libssl without symbolic link

2015-04-22 Thread Shanku Roy
@openssl.org Cc: Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 11:47 PM Subject: Re: [openssl-users] Building libcrypto/libssl without symbolic link On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:12:45AM +, Shanku Roy wrote: > lrw-r--r-- root root 2015-04-10 02:33 libcrypto.so -> > libcrypto.so.1.0.0 &

Re: [openssl-users] Building libcrypto/libssl without symbolic link

2015-04-21 Thread Erik Forsberg
Not sure what platform the other person is using, but, for the record the soname 1.0.0 causes big problems on Solaris 11 and up. Solaris 11 ships an OpenSSL 1.0.0 version in standard library locations, if anyone just builds anything higher than that, and do NOT modify build to add -R runtime load

Re: [openssl-users] Building libcrypto/libssl without symbolic link

2015-04-21 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:12:45AM +, Shanku Roy wrote: > lrw-r--r-- root root 2015-04-10 02:33 libcrypto.so -> > libcrypto.so.1.0.0 > -rw-r--r-- root root 1988088 2015-04-10 02:27 libcrypto.so.1.0.0 > > Is there any configure option in OpenSSL build scripts to not

[openssl-users] Building libcrypto/libssl without symbolic link

2015-04-21 Thread Shanku Roy
Hello OpneSSL Community, OpenSSL build system currently creates symbolic links to actual binaries and actual binaries are named as *.so.1.0.0 : lrw-r--r-- root root 2015-04-10 02:33 libcrypto.so -> libcrypto.so.1.0.0 -rw-r--r-- root root 1988088 2015-04-10 02:27 libc