On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Michael Wojcik
wrote:
>> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
>> Of Kim Gräsman
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 07:04
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Michael Wojcik
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > So, in short: You do in fact have
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
>
>> Any chance that OpenSSL 1.1 is different in this regard?
>
> No.
>
> Except that the install-top is simpler to configure.
Thanks, Rich. Yeah, I'm looking forward to the 1.1 build system!
- Kim
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe:
> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
> Of Kim Gräsman
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 07:04
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Michael Wojcik
> wrote:
> >
> > So, in short: You do in fact have to publish and maintain one architecture-
> specific header.
>
> Any chance that OpenSSL 1.1 is different in this regard?
No.
Except that the install-top is simpler to configure.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
Hi Michael,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Michael Wojcik
wrote:
>> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
>> Of Kim Gräsman
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 04:14
>>
>> Everything seems to work pretty well, but one thing is worrying -- the
>> opensslconf.h h
> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
> Of Kim Gräsman
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 04:14
>
> Everything seems to work pretty well, but one thing is worrying -- the
> opensslconf.h header comes out different between the two builds.
>
> I'm assuming this o
Hi all,
I'm working on building OpenSSL 1.0.2 for both Windows x86 and AMD64,
i.e. the VC-WIN32 and VC-WIN64A platforms.
Everything seems to work pretty well, but one thing is worrying -- the
opensslconf.h header comes out different between the two builds.
I'm assuming this only affects implemen
