Re: [openssl-users] [openssl-dev] Kerberos

2015-05-14 Thread Jeffrey Altman
On 5/13/2015 10:19 AM, Matt Caswell wrote: > > > On 08/05/15 09:40, Matt Caswell wrote: >> >> >> On 08/05/15 02:28, Jeffrey Altman wrote: >> >>> Regardless, the inability to improve the support in this area has left >>> the those organizations that rely upon 2712 with the choice of use >>> insecu

Re: [openssl-users] [openssl-dev] Kerberos

2015-05-13 Thread Matt Caswell
On 08/05/15 09:40, Matt Caswell wrote: > > > On 08/05/15 02:28, Jeffrey Altman wrote: > >> Regardless, the inability to improve the support in this area has left >> the those organizations that rely upon 2712 with the choice of use >> insecure protocols or re-implement the applications. I do

Re: [openssl-users] [openssl-dev] Kerberos

2015-05-08 Thread Nico Williams
I should have mentioned NPN and ALPN too. A TLS application could use ALPN to negotiate the use of a variant of the real application protocol, with the variant starting with a channel-bound GSS context token exchange. The ALPN approach can optimize the GSS mechanism negotiation, at the price of

Re: [openssl-users] [openssl-dev] Kerberos

2015-05-08 Thread Matt Caswell
On 08/05/15 02:28, Jeffrey Altman wrote: > Regardless, the inability to improve the support in this area has left > the those organizations that rely upon 2712 with the choice of use > insecure protocols or re-implement the applications. I do not believe > that any sane OS or application vendor