RE: Handling missing random number generator

Original message >Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 03:42:36 -0800 >From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The easiest way is to have the user install a random > device. There's ones out there > for Solaris all the way back to version 2.5.1 > > However, keep in mind that al

Re: VeriSign certificate with openssl

>Hello, >> We have a web server running on Apache/Tomcat platform (Sun Solaris 10) >> with a VeriSign certificate. I'm trying to use the same certificate with >> openssl 0.9.8f for my stand-alone web services application (listening on >> separate ports, of course). So I followed the procedure a

RE: Safe signed certificate generation during server installation ?

>> Storing some fingerprint of a certificate or public key locally >> in some trusted place (such as a local file system) seems to be >> quite secure (should be the same level as having a CAs root >> certificate in a file), however, I'm not sure if this works with >> OpenSSL which seems to expect t

RE: SSL_connect and SSL_accept

Original message >Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:01:54 -0700 >From: "David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: SSL_connect and SSL_accept >To: > > >> So what you are saying is the scenario we have been discussing so far is >> possible ONLY in case of memory allocation issues NOT O

RE: How to share SSL session when using CreateProcess/execv

>> Since he's talking about a process that forks, there >> shouldn't be a problem. >> He just needs to create a shared mapping in the parent. After >> the 'fork', the address will still be the same. > >However if the program forks and calls exec* then this issue could >arise. The title of the th

Re: Build problem on HP Itanium 64 bit machine

Original message >Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:02:32 +0200 >From: Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Build problem on HP Itanium 64 bit machine >To: openssl-users@openssl.org > >Hello, >> >> I am having problem building openssl on HP Itanium 64 bit box. >> Attached are th

Re: Build problem on HP Itanium 64 bit machine

Original message >Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 20:05:51 +0200 >From: Leif Thuresson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Build problem on HP Itanium 64 bit machine >To: openssl-users@openssl.org > >Hi, >I have also had problems building shared version of openssl-0.9.8b > on hpux-11.00 parisc

RE: Wrapping SSL_read/SSL_write so they behave like read/write.]

Original message >Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:22:37 -0700 >From: "David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: Wrapping SSL_read/SSL_write so they behave like read/write.] >To: > You should 'select' for writability if and only if you get a WANT_WRITE >indication, whether

Re: Wrapping SSL_read/SSL_write so they behave like read/write.]

Original message >Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:00:46 +0200 >From: Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Wrapping SSL_read/SSL_write so they behave like read/write.] >To: openssl-users@openssl.org >You may use select() but with some care. >Simplest way is to: > 1) wait on sele

Re: Connection problem with some ciphers ... ServerHello seems to be the problem

Hi, Thanks for the explanation of the data exchanged between the client and server. >In response to client_hello we received ALERT protocol message >(record header 15 03 00 00 02 means: > 15 - alert protocol > 0300 - SSL3 alert protocol > 0002 - length of data (should be 2 - an