RE: Please help

13:52 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Please help On Wed, Jul 23, 2003, steve thornton wrote: > Yes I've noticed this. Basically I am making an embedded client, and am > looking for every way possible to reduce code size, and obj_dat is very big. > I've more or less concluded

RE: Please help

PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dr. Stephen Henson Sent: 23 July 2003 12:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Please help On Wed, Jul 23, 2003, steve thornton wrote: > Hi > > I've been trying to edit and rebuild the ASN.1 database using objects.pl. I > am having pro

RE: Please help

I *think* I understand it now, but any clarification etc. would still be most appreciated. Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of steve thornton Sent: 23 July 2003 10:09 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please help Hi I've been tryi

Please help

Hi I've been trying to edit and rebuild the ASN.1 database using objects.pl. I am having problems understanding what is going on. As I understand it, the file to edit is objects.txt, but if I change this file in any way, then objects.pl no longer works. Can anybody please tell me what I should be

ASN.1 database

Hi I would like to try and reduce the size of the ASN.1 database, but am not sure how the various files work together - I see that there is a perl script to generate the necessary files, but I'm not too clear how this works. Can anybody help me out on how to edit and regenerate this? Many thanks

RE: Connection pool for HTTPS using OpenSSL

Jul 2003 14:49:41 +0100, "steve thornton" wrote: > > Sorry, can't read - you mean server. If you set up a session caching sceme, > then maintaining a pool of connections is cheap (ish) and straightforward. I > have code snippets if you need them > > Steve Heh

Reducing the size of the ASN.1 database

Hi folks, I've just sucessfully ported OpenSSL to run on a very small embedded real-time platform. I am now looking at ways to reduce the code size (more than I already have done), and am wondering if I can get rid of most of the entries in the ASN.1 database, as I am only doing the most *basic* c

RE: Problem with X509_set_verify()

OK I've found the problem. I can kluge my way around it, as it is something to do with the wierd stuff that I am doing, rather than any fault in OSSL. Thanks for everybodies input. At least it showed up a bug in the docs that has been corrected. thanks again Steve -Original Message- From

RE: Problem with X509_set_verify()

ult. thanks again Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lutz Jaenicke Sent: 26 June 2003 13:26 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problem with X509_set_verify() On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:07:22PM +0100, steve thornton wrote: > I'm us

RE: Problem with X509_set_verify()

verify() On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:07:19PM +0100, steve thornton wrote: > OK, I haven't found the problem. It does appear to be an OpenSSL bug. > > I use > > SSL_CTX_set_verify ( ctx, SSL_VERIFY_PEER, verifyCallbackProc ); > > and > > int verifyCallbackProc ( int ok,

RE: Problem with X509_set_verify()

shake. Can anybody confirm that this happens with standard OpenSSL builds? Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of steve thornton Sent: 26 June 2003 11:07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problem with X509_set_verify() I think I've

RE: Problem with X509_set_verify()

Behalf Of Lutz Jaenicke Sent: 26 June 2003 10:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problem with X509_set_verify() On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 10:07:08AM +0100, steve thornton wrote: > Actually, I take that back, it does get called whether the chain passes or > fails. However, it still crashe

RE: Problem with X509_set_verify()

Actually, I take that back, it does get called whether the chain passes or fails. However, it still crashes horribly when ok is altered. Any clues? Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of steve thornton Sent: 26 June 2003 09:53 To: [EMAIL

Problem with X509_set_verify()

Hi folks, I've been trying to use X509_set_verify() and an associated callback function to allow me to override the standard verification if necessary. According to the O'Reilly OpenSSL book, this function gets called on every connection, and allows the callback to alter the ok value, thus allowin

RE: Async IO on Windows

Hi,   Yes it is possible to change OpenSSL to do this (I've just done it), but it's a bit fiddly. Try BIO pairs first though.   Steve -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Steve CollinsSent: 30 May 2003 19:53To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sub