>Aside: this message was pretty garbled, and in richtext which my Outlook won't
>fix sensibly.
>I've tried to manually reformat what I can, but it would be easier if you
>posted plaintext.
Really sorry for that, I saw it only once message was already posted.
Thanks for taking the time anyway.
Hello again,>It doesn’t sound like you did profile, but rather a stop-watch at
start and >stop. That’s more coarse-grained than I think you need to do. For
example,>you need to measure time to do the key exchange, time to do the
encryption, >time to put the traffic over the network. For example,
>RSA key size only affects handshake, and should be costly client side only if
>>using client-auth; are you?No; as client and server code is under my
>responsability, I chosed to also asked for client-auth. Still, I don't see how
>this could be the reason for my slowdown given the overall data
(sorry for duplicating the thread, I did'nt receive any answer in my mailbox as
I expected, I only saw them through the mail archive...?)
>Are you sure that the key exchange is not a factor? Have you measured SSL
>>setup times compared to post-setup transfer times?>4K RSA is computationally
>exp
Hello,
I'm using openSSL on a low-end embedded processor: an Intel Atom running at
1.1Ghz.Using SSL divides down my transfer speed by two so I try to figure out
how I can improve performance.
For information I'm using 1.0.1e release, recompiled for Win32 (my embedded
system uses an XP embedded)
