I’m sorry to disturb you again,
but isn’t there anybody who knows the answer to my question? I'm thankful
for everything that could help me.
Best regards
domi
domi wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have got a question concerning the command openssl req -newkey rsa:bits
> …. whic
Thank you Bernhard/ Ted (?),
that is exactly what I was looking for. For everyone who wants to know the
time format: start reading Bernhards link from behind.
Best regards
Dominic
Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
>
>
> Have a look at
> http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-users@openssl.org/msg459
Hello Bruno and Thomas,
Number 1 and 4-6 are definitively right as long as I know. I think that
number 2 and 3 are correct too. But I‘m not quiet sure.
Thomas would you be so kind and tell me in what format the time is written?
Or just give me link where I can find the information; my search wasn
://www.openssl.org/news/news.html but I wasn’t able to find an answer
for my question. So I hope that somebody in this forum can help me.
Best regards
domi
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/bit-size-necessary-in-the-command%3A-openssl-req--newkey-rsa%3Abits--tf3790387.html#a10719161
Sent
= US
organizationName = some organization
[ root_ca_extensions ]
basicConstraints = CA:true
Thank you for reading my post. I hope that somebody might help me to include
the crlScope stuff or help me with some other solution.
best regards domi
--
View this message in context:
http
me know if you need further
information like my config-files or something else.
best regards domi
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-Partitioned-CRLs--how-to-split-a-CRL--tf3419056.html#a9529138
Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
cnf:
[ ca ]
default_ca = myca
[myca]
copy_extensions = copy
best regards domi
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/crlDistributionPoints-in-a-certificate-request-tf3148251.html#a8844382
Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive at
. But it is good to know
that there is a place where I can ask my OpenSSL questions ;)
best regards domi
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/A-problem-with-the-use-of-CRLs.-I%27m-still-able-to-access-a-site-although-the-certificate-is-revoked.-tf3169634.html#a8808160
Sent from
or
something else feel free to ask.
best regards domi
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/A-problem-with-the-use-of-CRLs.-I%27m-still-able-to-access-a-site-although-the-certificate-is-revoked.-tf3169634.html#a8792524
Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive
After one day pending-status I'll post this message again.
domi wrote:
>
> I won’t quote our complete conversation because it has grown to a rather
> huge amount of text. I just will say: Yes, Goetz you are right ;)
> So I come to the conclusion that I can’t to those things
tion
to my problem.
Greetings domi
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/crlDistributionPoints-in-a-certificate-request-tf3148251.html#a8749031
Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in the right direction but
having a variable for each client of the CA is not yet ideal.
I know that this scenario is probably not realisable today but that should
not care us in the meantime.
I’m anxious to read comments about “my” scenario or probably a solution for
my problem.
best regards
domi
Unfortunately I wasn't able to manage this.
I tried a lot of things like crlDistributionPoints=supplied for example but
nothing worked.
Summary: The certificate shall include the crlDistributionPoints without
being written static into the openssl.cnf of the CA.
greetings domi
--
View this messa
13 matches
Mail list logo