On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> After a build of openssl-1.0.1c on Solaris 10 with the Sun Studio 12
> compilers I was very surprised to see this :
>
> # ls -l libcrypto.a
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9908820968 Jul 17 19:47 libcrypto.a
It's not supposed to be th
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Barone, Philip wrote:
>> 2. Does the 11GB .a file contain multiple copies of each .o
>> file, perhaps every version you ever compiled? (You can test
>> this with the command $ ar -t libcrypto.a
>
> This does not appear to be the issue either
>
> Server1> ar -t lib
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> On 6/5/2012 6:19 AM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> According to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg00376.html the
>> last widely-used platform that crashed on free(NULL) was SunOS 4, which
>> "stopped being a rea
On 2012-06-04 8:10 PM, Dave Thompson wrote:
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Jakob Bohm
Having no current access to the C89 standard or its
drafts, I am relying on the experience that many "C89"
real world systems I have encountered did not tolerate
free(NULL). In contrast all
I've got a project ( https://github.com/zackw/moeller-ref ) which does
a bunch of elliptic curve operations against custom curves, using the
OpenSSL and/or Crypto++ low-level APIs (two parallel implementations
of the same asymmetric cryptosystem). One function in each
implementation performs decry
Is there a time frame for the final release of openssl 1.0.1 yet? I
need the GCM support, and I'd hate to have to ask people to install a
snapshot in order to build my program.
Thanks,
zw
__
OpenSSL Project
