On 12/26/08 8:12 PM, "Victor Duchovni"
wrote:
> Note, some CAs ignore SAN entires in the CSR and either don't support
> SAN certs at all, or require a separate SAN form to be filled in when
> uploading the CSR.
i can confirm that go daddy respects the san in their 5-domain cert product.
__
On 12/26/08 4:45 AM, "Kyle Hamilton" wrote:
> To deal with this, you need to either put the two domains on separate
> ports (which causes URLs of the form https://www.example2.com:4433/ ),
> or create a certificate with the subjectAlternativeName extension.
> The sAN is a list of values of the fo
On 12/14/08 7:04 PM, "Thomas J. Hruska"
wrote:
> I keep a lookout for truly free AND integrated SSL certificates. The
> main sticking point with that company is IE. They ARE NOT in the root
> certificate store in IE.* They ARE in the root certificate store in
> Firefox and Safari.
>
> http://
omain.com',
> 'www.domain.com', and 'domain.com'.
>
> Other than this, I can't really see any issues with your proposed config.
>
> -Kyle H
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Tom Worster wrote:
>> i about to buy a signed cert for the f
i about to buy a signed cert for the first time to use on a web server.
there seems to be a few possibilities so i'd like to ask about them.
i have two hosts for redundancy. each has apache/modssl and two vhosts: one
for http and the other for https. i want users to be able to reach the https
vhos
