Re: Moronism

2000-06-09 Thread Tom Schaefer
Gregory Stark wrote: > A-R-E Y-O-U R-E-T-A-R-D-E-D ? > > greg > N-O ... but it looks like you were dumb enough to take the bait ... BTW - if ya'll are flaming me in the list, I'll never know - it no longer matters, I think they fixed the problem cuz I aint gettin it no mo' mail from it. Ya

Re:

2000-06-08 Thread Tom Schaefer
Ronald, U N S U B C R I B E doesn't work you moron, so YOU'RE the one who's "so stupid" yuk yuk ... BTW -you should really not post anonymously with that fake name and fake company name. The only way to get the list manager's attention is to scream LOUDLY and cause a ruckus. A few flames here

Re: Compile Problems With .94 SUCCESS

2000-02-28 Thread Tom Schaefer
SUCCESS - Re: no-asm Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > From the look of your log file, something seems to have gone very > wrong when most of the crypto stuff was compiled. This is just a > guess, since you decided to show us only the end of the log, which > made at least me dearly miss th

Compile Problems With .94

2000-02-25 Thread Tom Schaefer
OK, what am I doing wrong. I've been successful on some systems, but it fails on others, and I really have no clue as to why. I run everything the way you show in the docs, but it fails. Now it seems to be failing more than not, and I don't know what's missing from my system, i.e. some sort of li