RE: memory leaks in openssl - urgent.......

the SSL_METHOD structure? Taral __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Does anyone know how to fix Multithreading??

'd be happy to help. Taral __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Does anyone know how to fix Multithreading??

ly, and I need to know what else it needs to check. Taral __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automate

Re: Does anyone know how to fix Multithreading??

"nonblocking"?] > Reads in effect all the time on one thread while I'm writing on another. I > can't very well single-thread the reads and writes. Open mouth, insert foot. Ignore my previous repl

RE: Does anyone know how to fix Multithreading??

is > real. Well, if BIO is thread-safe, then you can just have two locks, an inbound lock and an outbound lock. SSL_read: lock inbound lock ... (in some BIO thing) unlock inbound lock recv()/read() lock inbound lock ... (back in SSL_read) unlock inbound lock return SSL_write is similar, but

Re: Does anyone know how to fix Multithreading??

ably get around his problem the same way it's done in licq - do a select() on the descriptor itself before doing an SSL_read. By the way, what's all the code in crypto/threads for? Taral __ OpenSSL Project

Re: Does anyone know how to fix Multithreading??

SSL_write wrappers that claim/release that lock with each call. That way only concurrent accesses to the _same_ SSL structure will be serialized. Taral __ OpenSSL Project http://www

Re: 40 bit encryption

On 27 Jun, Tewari, Vijay wrote: > Hi, > How would I support 40 bit encryption in > an SSL application built using OpenSSL. It's already supported by default. Taral __ OpenSSL Project

Re: I am starting to wonder if it works at all.

he fact that the whole thing isn't tested much on machines without good randomness sources in general. -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Us

Re: "not enough random bytes"

On 21 Jun, Ulf Möller wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 03:41:58PM -0500, Taral wrote: > >> I have a /dev/urandom, and openssl reads 16 bytes from it. However the >> PRNG still reports insufficient entropy. Anyone have any idea why, and >> how I can fix it? (beside

"not enough random bytes"

I have a /dev/urandom, and openssl reads 16 bytes from it. However the PRNG still reports insufficient entropy. Anyone have any idea why, and how I can fix it? (besides using the -rand option) Taral __ OpenSSL Project