Re: openssl smime

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steven Bade wrote: | Is there a method/means to use the S/MIME function to encrypt a file, | but leave the content in a binary format, rather than conversion to | base64 etc?? | | Basically provide similar function to GnuPG but using X.509

openssl smime

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is there a method/means to use the S/MIME function to encrypt a file, but leave the content in a binary format, rather than conversion to base64 etc?? Basically provide similar function to GnuPG but using X.509 certificates , and the PKCS#X standards

Re: Questions on threading

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ken Goldman wrote: | Referring to http://www.openssl.org/docs/crypto/threads.html | | 1 | | "id_function(void) is a function that returns a thread ID. It is not | needed on Windows nor on platforms where getpid() returns a different | ID for each thre

Re: RSA encryption - to encrypt a c structure ??

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jayashree Kanchana wrote: | Hi, | | I am hoping that someone might have come across this problem and will be | able to help me. | | I am trying to use openssl to encrypt a "c structure" instead of just a | "string", is there any function in openssl that

Re: Engine for IBM 2058 eServer Cryptographic Accelerator?

There is a separate engine patch available for the 2058.. through ICA.. It is NOT the same as the 4758 engine which was NOT developed by IBM On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 13:05, Markus Lorch wrote: > Hi, > > does anyone know if the IBM 4758 engine also support the > IBM 2058 eServer Cryptographic Accelera

Re: Problem using IBM 4758 with openssl

Note.. for the 4758, you will have to use PKCS#11 through openCryptoki only, because there is not an openSSL engine for that specific device. The 4758 and the ICA are totaly different devices On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 07:47, Arne Ansper wrote: > > > > the libcsufsapi.a module is either compiled fo

Re: engine's performance (what's wrong?)

Good question... I've interacted with Broadcom directly on various occasions through my work with openCryptoki. Have you tried contacting them through their web site... Scott Johnson wrote: Do you know of a source for the Broadcom adapters? -Scott At 08:28 AM 1/30/2003, you wrote: Aleix

Re: engine's performance (what's wrong?)

Aleix Conchillo Flaque wrote: hi, well, first of all, let me thank you for the mail again. i was thinking the same thing yesterday morning: if you need your CPU to do other things, the cryptographic hardware can help you. the problem is when you only need cryptographic results in a real-time l

Re: PKCS#11 and the Schlumberger smartcard

FYI. Right now openCryptoki does not contain any smart card token support. We'd be glad to have you work on that with us... Bruce Cartland wrote: I am using PKCS#11 libraries supplied by vendors (although I'm starting to look at openCryptoki) to generate oncard keypairs and sign data for

Re: SSL server compatible with SSH client

> > -Thuy > __ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta2

0.9.7 no longer has separate engine and non-engine releases. The engine support is integrated into the single release now... Ken Hoo wrote: > Is there an "engine" for OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta2? Do I just use the 0.9.6d > version of the engine? > > __

Re: OpenSSL version

The engines are all vendor specific today... There has been some work to bring a PKCS#11 "engine" in Look in the mailing list archives for posts from adnovum... Eric Gilbertson wrote: > > Richard: > > I thought that the engine used PKCS#11 to interface to HSMs. In this > case it should b