Re: Basic functions, again...

2009-04-27 Thread Sever P A
Hello, (Steffen said:) > Generally it is strongly disencouradged to invent and implement > own security schemes. The more secure way is to use existing > crypto schemes (like TLS) and the safer way is to base on > existing implementations (like stunnel), I think. There are so > many things to cons

Re: Basic functions, again...

2009-04-27 Thread Sever P A
Hello, > (Steffen said:) I think stunnel could be suited well here. Maybe... but my idea was to implentent this functions in the C/C++ programm while the users has no computer expertise skills. I suddenly thought to integrate this in a batch file but... I don't really like this because complicat

Re: Basic functions, again...

2009-04-25 Thread Sever P A
Hello, Thanks Carl, Thanks Michael, My idea is implement in C/C++ the following steps: 1) The client generates two keys: one used as private, the other, as public. 2) The client connects to server. 3) The client sends to sever the public key. 4) The server generates a "connection key". 5) The se

Basic functions, again...

2009-04-24 Thread Sever P A
Hello, Maybe, in my last post, I didn't explain my problem as well... I'm trying to identify the functions to integrate in my client-server application (developped in C/C++ language) that allow me to construct an assimetric encryption system. Specifically, I need to know the functions for 1) Ge

Basic structure RSA functions

2009-04-23 Thread Sever P A
Hello, I'm a newbie, just to begin reading the programming API. I'm researching the functions involved in a client-server application environment (using RSA algorithm). So, If not wrong RSA_new() and RSA_generate_key(...) functions generate the pair of keys (the public and the private ones), but,