Hey Thanks a lot for the answer David.
Sanjay
--- David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I read many posts about multiple threads
> accessing
> > a single SSL connection for read/write. I am still
> > confused about the usage. What exactly is the
> truth?
>
> You cannot access
cause a problem?? If
yes, then can I make use of mutex locks to allow only
one thread access the SSL connection (for read/write)
at a time??? If no, I am happy :)
Thanks in advance,
Sanjay Acharya
Wichita State University
__
Celebrate
But Ted, if I have to use -days option then why do we
need to specify "default_days" name-value pairs in the
openssl.cnf? :(
Sanjay Acharya
Wichita State University
--- Bernhard Froehlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sanjay Acharya wrote:
>
> >Hello. I am pos
is
generated fine with the x509 and -days 365 option. Can
someone help me on this.
Sanjay Acharya
Wichita State University
---THE openssl.cnf FILE---
RANDFILE= $ENV::HOME/project/.rnd
[ ca ]
default_ca = my_ca_default
[ my_ca_default ]
dir = $ENV::HOME/project
certs
14:21:54 2005 GMT
notAfter=Mar 30 14:21:54 2005 GMT
I have the default_days set as default_days= 365
in my default_ca
What could be the problem? The certificate is
generated fine with the x509 option as mentioned in my
earlier mail.
Thanks in advance,
Sanjay Acharya
Wichita State Unive
e why this is
happening? Is it because I am using "req" option. I am
pasting my openssl.cnf below. The expiry date shows
fine if I run the above command with the "-days = 365"
option.
Thanks in advance,
Sanjay Acharya
Wichita State University
RANDFILE= $ENV::HOME