al for us to know whether it's a typo mistake in the OpenSSL
announcements or in the sites I noted above. Can anyone please assist us to in
clearing up this point?
Thanks in advance,
Rachel
-
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This
?
Thanks in advance for your help..
Rachel
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 3:16 PM
Subject: Re: engine and without engine
> From: "Rachel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> rachel> Does anyone know what the different between "OpenSSL 0.9.6b"
> rachel>
Does anyone know what the different between "OpenSSL 0.9.6b" and "OpenSSL
0.9.6b - engine"?
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ing a problem with 0.9.6b was that
libssl.so didn't have the linkages to libcrypto.so so no authentication and no
loading of httpd (but in mine case: the httpd is loading and running, only
SSL connection not aware).
Please help me... i
really got no idea....
Rachel
enssl so I'm
hoping it's something simple that I just don't know about. Any help
would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Rachel
PS Some code if it would be useful
void accept_cb(int s, SSL_CTX* ctx, struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t *addrlenp)
{
SSL* ssl;
BIO* s
ake then make
install, it puts Apache entirely inside /usr/local/apache. I then use a
System V init script I made myself to control it (it just feeds through to
/usr/local/apache/bin/apachectl) so the Apache binaries themselves do
