Ok, thanks.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dr. Stephen Henson
> Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 8:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 3-DES size
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2003, Pierre De Boeck wrote:
I would like to know the overhead in size when encrypting
a message of n bytes with 3DES.
A simple rule of thumb says that it will be n bytes plus
the padding needed for n to be a multiple of 64 bits (8 bytes).
Is it correct? and how the different modes (CBC,..)+ initialization
vector influences
.\.\e_os.h
-Original
Message-From: Pierre De
Boeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15,
2003 1:31
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Building on XP
Question
No, that
step is required to configure the platform-dependent files
(mak
f Of Jason BergerSent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 10:22
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Building on XP
Question
When try to run perl configure it tells me it doesn’t have a script called
configure? Can I skip this
step?
-Original
Message-From: Pierre De
Boeck [mai
I have
also XP and openssl 0.9.7b and I can build without any problems
the
static
and dll libraries (libeay32 and ssleay32) in debug and not debug
mode.
I have
also a lot of VC++ projects (6.0 and 7.0) that uses STL and
openssl.
For
building the libraries,
- perl
configure VC-WIN3
Ok, thanks a lot. The "patch" utility was the missing piece.
Pierre De Boeck
Sr System Engineer
Cipherquest
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Afchine
> Madjlessi
> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 6:10
ich should provide what I need.
So now my question: how do I apply a patch in OpenSsl?
I use Windows Xp with the MS compiler (VC-WIN32) and I have not
installed cygwin.
Pierre De Boeck
Sr System Engineer
Cipherquest
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:De Boeck;Pierre
FN:Cipherquest
ORG:Cipherquest
TITLE
as other implementations since MS
relies on experts from security companies like Entrust.
But I would be sure that their Certificate Server is
ok with respect to security.
Pierre De Boeck
Sr System Engineer
Mission Critical (Belgium)
Phone: +32 2 757 10 15 Fax: +32 2 759 276 0
email: [EMAIL
And I have no problem to import these objects
in external PKI apps like Netscape or CryptoApi.
Pierre De Boeck
Sr System Engineer
Mission Critical (Belgium)
Phone: +32 2 757 10 15 Fax: +32 2 759 276 0
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED
sufficient
rights to access the page (to be sure I have tested the page with no
SSL client authentication allowed).
On IIS4 and NT4, the same configuration worked fine!!!!
Pierre De Boeck
Sr System Engineer
Mission Critical (Belgium)
Phone: +32 2 757 10 15 Fax: +32 2 759 276 0
ema
ion.
- should_rety is true, then you have to ... retry. The best way is then
to perform a select instead of a polling.
Pierre De Boeck
Sr System Engineer
Mission Critical (Belgium)
Phone: +32 2 757 10 15 Fax: +32 2 759 276 0
email: [EMAIL PROTEC
Yes and your signature is ok.
Our smtp server is responsible? But why it works wihout
problem when I use just this one!!! The problems occurs only
when the mails cross several MTA.
Could you tell me if that signed reply was altered? I note also
that you use Netscape instead of Outlook.
> -O
example of detached signature.
Beside the fact that you don't trust my root CA, you will see the
warning of alteration.
Pierre De Boeck
Sr System Engineer
Mission Critical (Belgium)
Phone: +32 2 757 10 15 Fax: +32 2 759 276 0
email: [EMAIL PROT
An Rfc822Name is just an Internet e-mail address and is
formally defined in the Rfc 822. In simple terms, it has the
form name@domain.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wade L. Scholine
> Sent: Friday, June 11, 1999 3:59 PM
> To: '[EM
the 15th of the list
Has anyone an idea of someting wrong with my CA? The only thing
that is unique to it is the use of the Netscape
extension. Does IIS not support it?
Pierre De Boeck
Sr System Engineer
Mission Critical (Belgium)
Phone: +32 2 757 10 15 Fax: +32 2 759 276
simple server authentication
fails. Netscape says that the certificate cannot be used
for that application.
Any idea for these problems? I suppose that some exstension
is lacking in my certificates but wich ones?
Pierre De Boeck
Sr System Engineer
Mission Critical (Belgium)
Phone: +32 2
that NET format?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dr Stephen Henson
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 1999 6:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: IIS and keyset file format
>
>
> Pierre De Boeck wrote
I have a similar question.
I have generated my own SA key/certificate and I want to import
the whole set nto IIS with key manager. What format is used
for that importation?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dr Stephen Henson
> Sent:
Does anyone have information about the format
used by IIS/key manager to import an RSA key pair and
its corresponding CA chain?
I naively believed that MS will standards like PKCS#1
and PKCS7 but this is not the case. I also try a PKCS12
file but with no more success.
Pierre De Boeck
Sr
Use PKCS12 for that.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Yuriy Stul
> Sent: Monday, February 08, 1999 6:49 AM
> To: Microsoft Cryptographic API
> Cc: Open SSL developers list; Open SSL users list; SSL Developers List;
> SSL Users
> Subje
20 matches
Mail list logo