echnical tests passed, as far as I'm aware, but I'm not in the
loop and there's a lot of private info that's passed between the
testing companies and the vendors.)
-Kyle H
On 3/3/06, OpenSSLGRT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi --
>
> Thanks for the below info.
>
nt: Friday, March 03, 2006 6:58 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: SPAM-URL Re: Another RAND question...
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006, OpenSSLGRT wrote:
> I did see that but I think I misunderstood, so ...
> I still am not sure then how I would accomplish the following:
> 1.) Take a seed a
( buf1, sizeof(buf1) );
RAND_pseudo_bytes( buf2, sizeof(buf2) );
//bu1 never equals buf2
RAND_cleanup();
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Candler
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 2:33 PM
To: OpenSSLGRT
Cc: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject
When calling RAND_pseudo_bytes
is it correct that the PRNG will not give the same result even though I have
the same seed (I thought if I had the same seed I could get the same results
each time)?
Thank you!
The below produces two different
random numbers:
#include
#include
#
In the FIPs version I see
that you can set a key and a seed for PRNG. I have been looking around for how
to set a key in the non-FIPS (0.9.8a) version and if I read the man pages
correctly (which is suspect J)
it looks like this is not supportted in non-FIPS (that is, is the way you
generat
Earlier I posted saying I needed to do the following for
0.9.8a:
Startup Known Answer Tests: RSA, 3DES, Pseudorandom Number Generator
(PRNG), and HMAC SHA-1
As well as:
-Continuous Random Number Generator Test for the PRNG
-Continuous Random Number Generator Test to test the entropy of
Hi -
I understand 0.9.8a has no FIPs code and we will not have to have it
validated, but rather we are using this in our PDA product to force TLS and
to allow selecting of correct cipher suites and that product will be the
thing to be validated and so since OpenSSL 0.9.8a is not FIPs validated we
OpenSSL 0.9.8a
We are required to perform the following self tests on our implementation
of OpenSSL for FIPs:
Known Answer Tests:
-RSA
-3DES
-Pseudorandom Number Generator (PRNG)
-HMAC SHA-1
Continuous Random Number Generator Test for the PRNG
Continuous Random Number Ge
/~pervasive/wce_lite_compat/)
where I got the info and Portable OpenSSL src to use here!
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-users@openssl.org
[mailto:owner-openssl-users@openssl.org] On Behalf Of OpenSSLGRT
Sent: Wednesday,
February 08, 2006 10:43 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
/~pervasive/wce_lite_compat/)
where I got the info and Portable OpenSSL src to use here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of OpenSSLGRT
Sent: Wednesday,
February 08, 2006 10:43 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Compile For WinCE
I tried to compile OpenSSL 0.9.8a for Windows CE but I get
errors saying many include files are missing.
Can someone say if the below steps are correct or help solve
errors – thank you!:
I used Pervasive Computing’s OpenSSL files
-downloaded src from http://www.it.uc3m.es/pervasive
Hi –
I have a simple TLS client with OpenSSL. It works fine but
one oddity…
When all is completed I call SSL_shutdown(ssl). At that
point I see in the sniffer trace an Encryption Alert
I read response from server -- SSL_read(ssl, buff2,
sizeof(buff2) - 1);
https > 1154 [FIN, ACK]
0.9.7 version so I wonder how that
works – how did people use OpenSSL before OpenSSL was FIPs validated to
get their apps validated?
Thanks for any info!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of OpenSSLGRT
Sent: Saturday,
February 04, 2006 4:13 PM
I am using Portable OpenSSL 0.9.8a for Windows CE 4.20e (http://karajan.it.uc3m.es/~pervasive/wce_lite_compat/)
to force my PocketPC 2003 application to post data to our server using TLS and
cipher suite 3DES, SHA1, RSA. Works great! The reason for this is to prepare
for FIPs 140-2 (forcing
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Díaz Sánchez
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006
5:38 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: PocketPC Port
Question
Hello,
I have sent
the lib files to OpenSSLGRT. Although the libraries,
applications and libs can be built from the code
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Thomas J. Hruska
Sent: Saturday,
January 28, 2006 12:24
PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: PocketPC
Port Question
OpenSSLGRT wrote:
> Thank you for sending
the headers. I still have problem that if I use
> libeay32.dll and
ssleay32.dll fr
-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: PocketPC Port Question
I have sent an
email to OpenSSLGRT with the headers, I will update the site with that when I have
time…
Apart from
that, we are preparing a version that uses full Win32 API, as suggested in an
older topic, and no compatibility library will
I tried Portable OpenSSL 0.9.8a for Windows CE 4.20e (http://karajan.it.uc3m.es/~pervasive/wce_lite_compat/)
and it works great on the PocketPC (Dell Axim ARMv4 processor).
Now I want to develop small C++ (eVC SP4) app that will do
ssl but
Details on the problem:
-Build for WCE
I just got Mr. Sanchez OpenSSL port to PDA (http://karajan.it.uc3m.es/~pervasive/wce_lite_compat/)
– and it works great! I have a simple SSL Client in C++. Now I want to
convert that to C#. I assume(???) that I would use the two DLLs but libeay32.dll and ssleay32.dll that I now have on the
I downloaded OpenSSL and made a simple SSL client for
Windows. I used the binary distribution from http://www.slproweb.com/products/Win32OpenSSL.html
and it came with Windows libs. I now want that to work on Pocket PC 2003 application.
I need to figure out how to get libs for PocketPC 2003
20 matches
Mail list logo
