ay 14 January 2016 10:59:01 Mauro Romano Trajber wrote:
> > > Could you send me the ca command line? There's any way to run it
> without
> > > creating a .cnf - using only <(print notation?
> >
> > To be honest, I don't know whether you could run it p
There's any advantage to use ca command instead x509 command? Why there's
two different ways to sign a certificate request?
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Gareth Williams <
gar...@garethwilliams.me.uk> wrote:
> On Thursday 14 January 2016 10:59:01 Mauro Romano Trajber w
Could you send me the ca command line? There's any way to run it without
creating a .cnf - using only <(print notation?
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Gareth Williams <
gar...@garethwilliams.me.uk> wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 January 2016 16:22:10 Mauro Romano Trajber
>
ert
Requested Extensions:
X509v3 Subject Alternative Name:
IP Address:1.1.1.1, DNS:www.example.com
...
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> > On Jan 13, 2016, at 1:22 PM, Mauro Romano Trajber
> wrote:
> >
> >
In which section?
On section [CA_default] I have 'copy_extensions = copy'
Can I do this using only command line options?
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
> >But when I try to sign it using my own CA using the x509 command this
> data is removed
>
> You need to make sure that
Hi,
I created a CSR with subjectAlternativeNames:
$ openssl req -noout -in my.csr -text
Requested Extensions:
X509v3 Subject Alternative Name:
IP Address:1.1.1.1, DNS:www.example.com
...
But when I try to sign it using my own CA using the x509 command this data
