te against?
Den 21. sep 2004, kl. 15:43, skrev Lee Baydush:
> You can't tell if it has been revoked. That's why they are 'trusted
> roots'. If you think your root ca has been compromised, that is when
> you usually hit the big red panic button and shut down the
You can't tell if it has been revoked. That's why they are 'trusted roots'. If you
think your root ca has been compromised, that is when you usually hit the big red
panic button and shut down the shop.
-Original Message-
From: Jon Bendtsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, Septe
--- Lee Baydush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
Do you know are you trying to output to an input
only BIO? I assume you also checked the hbio!=NULL
and cert!=NULL?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcos Paraiso
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004
Will somebody tell me how to add an OID and corresponding verification routine to
OpenSSL version 0.9.7c to verify a SHA-256 signature. Currently I am trapping the
X509_V_ERR_CERT_SIGNATURE_FAILURE and X509_V_ERR_CRL_SIGNATURE_FAILURE errors in my
verify callback routine, comparing the OID in t
Do you know are you trying to output to an input only BIO? I assume you also checked
the hbio!=NULL and cert!=NULL?
-Original Message-
From: Marcos Paraiso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 9:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problems with get_notAfter
Hi ev
