Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory

2014-06-05 Thread Juha Saarinen
Hi Steve, That’s quite a few in one go - is this due to greater testing of OpenSSL and more scrutiny of the code by the community? Of the flaws listed, which is the one of most concern? This kind of begs the question what to do with all those embedded systems that run older versions of OpenSSL

RE: (HotStocks Spam) Solutions

2000-09-29 Thread Juha Saarinen
%-> But, then again, after nearly 18 years of "Internet" connectivity and %-> constant urging of our fellow employees who remember the "good %-> old days", we %-> are fairly close to what one might call "zero tolerance". Yep, and ORBS' insistence on abusing non-relaying MTAs that have never been

RE: (HotStocks Spam) Solutions

2000-09-29 Thread Juha Saarinen
%-> There probably is a way - perhaps a direct tap into orbs - BUT %-> that would %-> affect us more than them. See - if they ISP the emails are originating %-> from is in say ORBS then all mail from that ISP will get bounced - hense Not ORBS, thanks. It has spite-listed most of my ISP's netbloc

RPM -ta fails with 0.9.6

2000-09-27 Thread Juha Saarinen
This is as far as I get... ../certs/vsigntca.pem: OK Generate a set of DH parameters ./dhtest .+.++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*++*+ +*++*++* p=E063DD42B2E294D3 g=5 pri 1=46C278B63CE23DAD pub 1=C4BF8DF2FF965D66 pri 2=4DEFB8E041D68290 pub 2=6F7EA01B7