At 15.02.01 18:19, you wrote:
>What's more, the attack I was refering to, as someone made me notice already,
>requires "e" messages, not 2, so it's more difficult to do if you use a
>large e,like 65535.
I´ve read this post as well.
Thanks for all the info, guys, the code is now working as inten
At 16.02.01 01:52, you wrote:
>I'm guessing that RSA_eay_private_encrypt uses padding
>type 1 since this function isn't intended for encrypting data, just signing
>it, because data that can be decrypted with a "public" key isn't really
>secure.
You´re right about that. The main goal is indeed pro
A Decryption Error.\n");
delete [] dest;
delete [] tmpDest;
delete [] tmpSrc;
return 0;
}
}
--------
--
Jan Zoellner - VidSoft GmbH
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - T
