On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Wim Lewis wrote:
>
> On Oct 23, 2014, at 10:17 PM, Vladimir Zatsepin <
> vladimir.zatse...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Does somebody know how OPENSSL_cleanse() works?
> > I don't understand what this [17, 63, 0xF] values means. Why such values
> were chosen?
>
> I think
On Aug 31, 2014 9:28 PM, "Michael Cantrell"
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to run OpenSSL on an ARM922T processor running uClinux, and
I'm having trouble. I'm able to cross compile the binary and libraries
using the manufacturer's toolchain.
>
> ./Configure linux-generic32 -DL_ENDIAN --prefix=/usr/
Hi Jakob,
Thanks - I think this has now been corrected, the website should sync
within an hour or so. Please let me know if you see anything amiss.
Cheers,
Geoff
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> Dear OpenSSL web page subteam,
>
> CVE 2014-0195 is listed in
>
> https://w
The redhat podcast with Mark (Cox) probably answers this best;
http://bit.ly/Th64oP
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Juha Saarinen wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> That’s quite a few in one go - is this due to greater testing of OpenSSL
> and more scrutiny of the code by the community?
>
> Of the flaws
Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> On 5/30/2014 12:24 AM, Geoffrey Thorpe wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>>
>> The only way to to avoid any political overtones in such a situation (if
>> that really is your intention, because "doing the right thing&quo
I am curious how you would reconcile your two insinuations;
1. that it is a political act to accept donations form a party that has a
particular nationality (or with this or that underlying ownership), even if
that party does so with explicit knowledge that a fundamental condition of
acceptance is
