I was that second developer and even though 'Embedded Devel' listed
this as "paid" work and even though he made repeated promises about
following up on payment, I never did receive payment.
I checked the email address and IP addresses used for this job and
found nothin
On 5/3/21 2:20 PM, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
Just for the record:
On 26/03/21 09:51, Embedded Devel wrote:
i now have a second developer looking at this, so hoping he can sort
it all out.
[...]
I was that second developer and even though 'Embedded Devel' listed
this as "
This has now been fixed SSL is working
On 3/26/21 3:51 PM, Embedded Devel wrote:
On 3/26/21 2:46 PM, David von Oheimb wrote:
Embedded Devel,
my sympathy - I know this can be painful and frustrating.
From which old OpenSSL version to which target version do you need to
get the code
On 3/26/21 2:46 PM, David von Oheimb wrote:
Embedded Devel,
my sympathy - I know this can be painful and frustrating.
From which old OpenSSL version to which target version do you need to
get the code updated?
And as info to whoever may be considering picking up this task: which
is your
I tried to get through this on my own, not being a openssl developer,
made progress but still no joy
so we had an app that was written some 8-10 years ago, which worked fine
for client/server tls
update to today, no longer functional, deprecations in openssl cause errors
it is not a large ap
On 3/24/21 9:53 PM, Embedded Devel wrote:
On 3/23/21 11:06 PM, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 23/03/2021 15:47, Embedded Devel wrote:
Do you know if your application is statically linked or dynamically
linked to OpenSSL?
Ive attached the code in question if it helps
and nope still have the
On 3/23/21 11:06 PM, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 23/03/2021 15:47, Embedded Devel wrote:
Do you know if your application is statically linked or dynamically
linked to OpenSSL?
Ive attached the code in question if it helps
original code was deprecated, and changed from
/* if ((ssl_con
On 3/23/21 11:06 PM, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 23/03/2021 15:47, Embedded Devel wrote:
Do you know if your application is statically linked or dynamically
linked to OpenSSL?
Ive attached the code in question if it helps
Looks like the original developer already tried to print the contents
IM inclined top think the code for the certs is ok, but can really say,
and im not an openssl programmer by any means... just need someone to
put eyes on the code and fix it really.
The cert looks ok - at least nothing obviously wrong. 2048 bit RSA key.
yes freshly generated
when i run the
On 3/23/21 9:31 PM, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 23/03/2021 02:37, Embedded Devel wrote:
I have an application previously written for us 10+ years ago that no
longer seems to be happy
Has something happened that might have caused this? Did you upgrade
OpenSSL, or do some other kind of update
I have an application previously written for us 10+ years ago that no
longer seems to be happy
and the original dev is no longer available, so who can i pay to bang
this out and make it happy, or who can guide me through getting it
functional... basic info below.
I have a client process whi
Lets try again... ;)
I'm looking into the sources and I don't believe I need the engines or apps
libs.
Can someone clarify engines (or point me to the proper documentation)? I'm
under the impression that it's for HW support.
I'm mainly interested in SSL and some crypto algorithms. I presume it
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Engines-compilation.-tp16421932p16421932.html
Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
OpenSSL Project http://ww
Thanks Marek,
So SHA256/SHA384/SHA512 are not independant of eachother?
Embedded wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> Can SHA be used without compiling in SHA512 support?
>
> Are there any caveats with this approach?
>
> Thx
>
--
View this message in context:
http:/
HI,
Can SHA be used without compiling in SHA512 support?
Are there any caveats with this approach?
Thx
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/SHA-support-tp16418445p16418445.html
Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
r on your own.
>
> You are welcome to purchase support from anyone who will sell it to you.
>
>> > I'm compiling for a 32Bit embedded environment and am working modifying
>> > the Makefile to successfully compile.
>
> You don't state the platform! That sh
.
>
> When you wish to port OpenSSL to an embedded system (like I've done
> several
> years ago - a paid job which results I'm not permitted to share with you)
> you should start looking at e_os.h and e_os2.h
>
> Porting software, especially when it comes to embedded
hen your on your own.
Embedded wrote:
>
> I'm compiling for a 32Bit embedded environment and am working modifying
> the Makefile to successfully compile.
>
> I've run into a couple of errors regarding endianness and 64bit types.
>
> 1. I'm using -DL_ENDIAN as a CF
I'm compiling for a 32Bit embedded environment and am working modifying the
Makefile to successfully compile.
I've run into a couple of errors regarding endianness and 64bit types.
1. I'm using -DL_ENDIAN as a CFLAG but run into an error when including
ieeefp.h. Can someone exp
19 matches
Mail list logo
