nothing don't need to happen to the kid and I can't pick any one so I just
come out side
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, 3:14 AM Dustin Albright
wrote:
> I come out side on fruit porch the kid and dad's in side like I said I
> can't pick I'd how I ended up doing this but
I come out side on fruit porch the kid and dad's in side like I said I
can't pick I'd how I ended up doing this but I'm here on the porch u diseve
the respece
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, 3:02 AM Dustin Albright
wrote:
> this really wasn't my intention on all this not
this really wasn't my intention on all this not really sure how I don't it
eat her
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, 2:18 AM Walter H. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> which of these possibilities is the correct one?
>
> (a) CN=*.example.com
> and subjectAltName = DNS:*.example.com, DNS:example.com
>
> (b) CN=ex
if u would like to talk I will come talk with u because u divers the
respect
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, 2:18 AM Walter H. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> which of these possibilities is the correct one?
>
> (a) CN=*.example.com
> and subjectAltName = DNS:*.example.com, DNS:example.com
>
> (b) CN=example.c
I'm Dustin Albright I see what u r say thing there two listed so that's
old man in back and me inn liven room with Lil Lil man
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, 2:55 AM Kyle Hamilton wrote:
> If subjectAltName exists, CN= is not evaluated. All the given
> examples should work. (The onl
I'm 25 Lil 18 old man in back the man in the back I'm not Goin to fight u I
know I have to give my phone to u and are willing to so the rest is up to u
and watch u diside
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, 2:18 AM Walter H. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> which of these possibilities is the correct one?
>
> (a) CN=*.ex
I can pick any one of my own family old man's in the back me Lil man and
girl in liven room
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, 2:18 AM Walter H. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> which of these possibilities is the correct one?
>
> (a) CN=*.example.com
> and subjectAltName = DNS:*.example.com, DNS:example.com
>
> (b
so the way I'm take this it's pick and chose who walks right
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, 2:18 AM Walter H. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> which of these possibilities is the correct one?
>
> (a) CN=*.example.com
> and subjectAltName = DNS:*.example.com, DNS:example.com
>
> (b) CN=example.com
> and su
may we talk
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, 2:18 AM Walter H. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> which of these possibilities is the correct one?
>
> (a) CN=*.example.com
> and subjectAltName = DNS:*.example.com, DNS:example.com
>
> (b) CN=example.com
> and subjectAltName = DNS:example.com, DNS:*.example.com
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, 2:18 AM Walter H. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> which of these possibilities is the correct one?
>
> (a) CN=*.example.com
> and subjectAltName = DNS:*.example.com, DNS:example.com
>
> (b) CN=example.com
> and subjectAltName = DNS:example.com, DNS:*.example.com
>
> (c) CN=
I'm trying to get on a open ss user I'm on a phone
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018, 6:11 PM Dustin Albright
wrote:
> trying to get it open
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018, 6:08 PM Dustin Albright
> wrote:
>
>> I don't want to I don't know how to do this
>>
>> O
trying to get it open
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018, 6:08 PM Dustin Albright
wrote:
> I don't want to I don't know how to do this
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018, 6:06 PM Dustin Albright
> wrote:
>
>> No had to bring in grocery sorry about that
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 9, 20
I don't want to I don't know how to do this
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018, 6:06 PM Dustin Albright
wrote:
> No had to bring in grocery sorry about that
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018, 5:45 PM Jeremy Harris wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> OpenSSL version 1.1.1 FIPS, on Fe
No had to bring in grocery sorry about that
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018, 5:45 PM Jeremy Harris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OpenSSL version 1.1.1 FIPS, on Fedora 29
>
> (on both client and server)
>
>
> I'm seeing a client not receiving, or ignoring, what
> should be a fatal alert from the server during ha
Hey I tried I didn't know what was up
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018, 8:50 AM Matt Caswell wrote:
>
>
> On 09/10/18 10:43, Satish Lvr wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Can we assume that backward compatibility would be maintained between
> > letter releases of a version such as openSSL 1.0.2 (Eg: between openSSL
I am sorry
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018, 5:44 AM Satish Lvr wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can we assume that backward compatibility would be maintained between
> letter releases of a version such as openSSL 1.0.2 (Eg: between openSSL
> 1.0.2a and openSSL 1.0.2p) unless there is security bug fix ?
>
> Regards
> Sa
16 matches
Mail list logo