Re: TLS 1.3 Early data

Hi, seconds after I send the previous mail, I found the bug in my code. It is working with Benjamin's suggestion. Thanks Jens On 12/11/2022 11:18, Dirk Menstermann wrote: Hi Benjamin, thanks for your response. I updated to 111s and replaced the SNI callback with the ClientHello callba

Re: TLS 1.3 Early data

:12, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 11:50:18AM +0100, Dirk Menstermann wrote: Hello, I did few experiments with early data but was not successful in solving my exotic use case: "Using early data dependent on the SNI" I control the server (linux, supports http2) based

TLS 1.3 Early data

Hello, I did few experiments with early data but was not successful in solving my exotic use case: "Using early data dependent on the SNI" I control the server (linux, supports http2) based on OpenSSL 111q and use a recent firefox as client: 1) Setting SSL_CTX_set_max_early_data in the SSL_CTX*

OpenSSL 111: authorityKeyIdentifier

Hi, I’m using OpenSSL 1.1.1 to issue a certificate and include the AKI by defining authorityKeyIdentifier = keyid,issuer:always The issued certificate contains the AKI afterwards with 3 values: KeyID: issuer's key id Serial: issuer's serial Issuer: the issuer’s issuer, not the issuer’s subje

Re: [openssl-users] Example code to add several CRL distribution points

GEN_URI, and > whose value (as an IA5String) is the url you want, and then point > distpoint->name.fullname at the GENERAL_NAMES. > > And, as before, you can do this multiple times and add additional DIST_POINTs. > > Good luck, > -Dave > > >> On Nov 23, 2

Re: [openssl-users] Example code to add several CRL distribution points

Thanks Dave, It seems that I do something wrong when filling the STACK_OF(DIST_POINT): X509_NAME_ENTRY *nameEntry = X509_NAME_ENTRY_new(); X509_NAME_ENTRY_set_data (nameEntry, V_ASN1_IA5STRING /*MBSTRING_ASC*/, (const unsigned char*) "http://example.com/";, 19); S

[openssl-users] Example code to add several CRL distribution points

Hi, can anybody share example code to add more than 1 CRL distribution point to a certificate? The below works only for one URI: X509_EXTENSION *ext = X509V3_EXT_conf_nid (NULL, &v3ctx, NID_crl_distribution_points, (char*) "URI:http://exmaple.com/crl";); X509_add_ext (certificate, ext, -1); Tha

[openssl-users] Problems with OpenSSL 1.0.2 h

Hi, I've trouble with the newest OpenSSL as I'm operating a webserver application that answers with HTTP1.x and HTTP2. I registered the ALPN callback and in this the cipher list was adjusted "SSL_set_cipher_list (ssl, "ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256")" if H2 was negotiated. With versions < OpenSSL

Re: [openssl-users] Available ciphers

Anybody able to help? Thanks Dirk On 10.11.2015 17:09, Dirk Menstermann wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using openssl 1.0.2 (as web server application) and utilize the APLN > callback to react on protocols offered by the client. In this callback I need > a > way to get the list of

[openssl-users] Available ciphers

Hi, I'm using openssl 1.0.2 (as web server application) and utilize the APLN callback to react on protocols offered by the client. In this callback I need a way to get the list of ciphers that the client sends within the client_hello. Background is that http2 should only be negotiated if client s

Re: [openssl-users] How to get encryption strength?

Hi Steve, as far as I can see this works only if the application embedding openssl is the ssl client; but how can this be achieved from the server's point of view? Thanks Dirk On 25.03.2015 16:35, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015, Dirk Menstermann wrote: >

Re: [openssl-users] How to get encryption strength?

Very helpful. Thank you Steve. Dirk On 25.03.2015 16:35, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015, Dirk Menstermann wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> which API function can I use to obtain the bit strength of the key exchange >> (size of the DH or ECDH parameters

[openssl-users] How to get encryption strength?

Hello, which API function can I use to obtain the bit strength of the key exchange (size of the DH or ECDH parameters)? There is the function SSL_get_cipher_bits, but this is only for the symmetric cipher, not including the key exchange. Thanks Dirk __

FIPS: RSA key generation method

Hello, I try to understand which function will be called in FIPS mode to generate an RSA key. While looking trough the code I found two candidates: RSA_X931_generate_key_ex (in rsa_x931g.c) rsa_buildin_keygen in (rsa_gen.c) They seem to use different algorithms, but both contains FIPS-checks lik

1.0.1 FIPS and CRYPTO_set_mem_functions

Hi, I just recognized that openssl 1.0.1 prevents setting of alloc, re-alloc and free functions if compiled with FIPS support. Can anybody give the background, why this was changed (compared to 0.9.8)? Thanks a lot Dirk __ OpenSS

Re: AES GCM + padding

Thank you Matt! On 08.02.2013 16:33, Matt Caswell wrote: > It is a feature of GCM that the ciphertext (excluding the authentication tag) > is > identical length to the plaintext. Therefore no padding is required. > > Matt > > On 8 February 2013 14:27, Dirk Mensterm

AES GCM + padding

Hi, I'm playing around with "EVP_aes_128_gcm". This works, but it seems that EVP_* does not include padding. Is this expected/needed or did I miss a step? Thanks Dirk __ OpenSSL Project http://www.

Re: Non-Blocking and ENGINE

Thank you Stephen. On 04.10.2012 17:34, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012, Dirk Menstermann wrote: > >> Hello list, >> >> is there a way to use ENGINEs in a non-blocking way - meaning for a network >> operation (remote HSM) the thread can do som

Re: Non-Blocking and ENGINE

Anybody? Thanks On 02.10.2012 15:58, Dirk Menstermann wrote: > Hello list, > > is there a way to use ENGINEs in a non-blocking way - meaning for a network > operation (remote HSM) the thread can do something else instead of waiting for > the IO operation to complete? >

Non-Blocking and ENGINE

Hello list, is there a way to use ENGINEs in a non-blocking way - meaning for a network operation (remote HSM) the thread can do something else instead of waiting for the IO operation to complete? Thanks Jens __ OpenSSL Project

Re: FIPS in 1.0.1 windows 7 64 bit compile / link problems

Hello Steve, do you see another way to force the error state? Thanks Dirk On 03.07.2012 10:49, Dirk Menstermann wrote: > Hello Steve, > > On 02.07.2012 19:37, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: > >> >> As I indicated HEAD wont work as it isn't currently FIPS capable. &g

Re: FIPS in 1.0.1 windows 7 64 bit compile / link problems

Hello Steve, On 02.07.2012 19:37, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: > > As I indicated HEAD wont work as it isn't currently FIPS capable. OK - I will concentrate on 1.0.1c! The (largely > internal use) functions like FIPS_corupt_aes are not exported from the Windows > DLL at present: do you have a sp

Re: FIPS in 1.0.1 windows 7 64 bit compile / link problems

Subject: FIPS in 1.0.1 windows 7 64 bit compile / link problems >> >> Anybody able to help me (problem posted below some days ago)? >> >> Thanks a lot >> Dirk >> >> On 27.06.2012 14:42, Dirk Menstermann wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> >

FIPS in 1.0.1 windows 7 64 bit compile / link problems

Anybody able to help me (problem posted below some days ago)? Thanks a lot Dirk On 27.06.2012 14:42, Dirk Menstermann wrote: > Hello, > > I tried to build the FIPS version (openssl-fips-2.0.1) on win7 and VS2005 > (command line prompt) using the build target debug-VC-WIN64A and opti

FIPS in 1.0.1?

Anybody able to help me? Thanks a lot Dirk On 27.06.2012 14:42, Dirk Menstermann wrote: > Hello, > > I tried to build the FIPS version (openssl-fips-2.0.1) on win7 and VS2005 > (command line prompt) using the build target debug-VC-WIN64A and option > no-asm. > &g

Re: FIPS in 1.0.0?

' Stop. Can anybody help me? With which versions is it supposed to work (win 7 64 bit) Thanks a lot Dirk On 15.05.2012 22:18, Steve Marquess wrote: > On 05/15/2012 12:03 PM, Dirk Menstermann wrote: >> Hello, >> >> are the sassumptions below correct? >> >>

Re: Reading digest algorithm from x509

Thank you Steve! Bye Jens On 18.06.2012 19:42, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012, Dirk Menstermann wrote: > >> Thanks, >> >> unfortunately I forget to include the information that I need to know it >> from a >> c programm, not from the shell

Re: Reading digest algorithm from x509

Thanks, unfortunately I forget to include the information that I need to know it from a c programm, not from the shell. Do you also know the solution here? Thanks __ OpenSSL Project http://www.o

Reading digest algorithm from x509

Hello, Would anybody be so kind to explain me how I can read the digest algorithm (sha1, sha256, other) from a X509 struct that was used by a CA when issuing the certificate (I am using version 0.9.8). Thanks Dirk __ OpenSSL Proj

FIPS in 1.0.0?

Hello, are the sassumptions below correct? For 0.9.8 I have to use fips123 For 1.0.1 I have to use fips2 For 1.0.0 there isn't a fips implementation. Thanks Dirk __ OpenSSL Project http://www.op

Re: Disabling kEDH on webservers for scaling?

Hello Steve, On 26.04.2012 15:50, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: > > What DH parameters are you using? You can get better performance by tweaking > the parameters. > Can you explain how to tweak the parameters and if this reduces security. Thanks Dirk __

OpenSSL 1.0.1

Hello, is there somewhere a release schedule for version 1.0.1 published? Thanks Dirk __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.or

Re: Padding schemes [was Differences between RSA and ECDSA - Conceptual and Practical]

Thanks, On 14.10.2011 13:16, Jakob Bohm wrote: >> > Unfortunately not, I am a security engineer, not a fully trained > cryptographer/cryptanalyst. > > As an engineer I am aware that attacking an algorithm such as RSA is easier > the > more the > attacker knows or can control about the input, an

Re: Padding schemes [was Differences between RSA and ECDSA - Conceptual and Practical]

Hello Jakob, On 12.10.2011 22:21, Jakob Bohm wrote: >> I know that to sign, i have to take a hash of some document or message but, >> theoretically, i could encrypt any document? The padding scheme would shrink >> the message and them could reveal the same message after deciphering? > The padding

RSA key exchange

Hello list, I've questions about how (temporary) RSA keys will be used in a SSL/TLS handshake. I understand that DH key exchange is the preferred and standard way to exchange the shared secret. Nevertheless 1) When will RSA key exchange be used? Is this a configuration of the server? 2) Are the

Re: 'No shared cipher error' connecting to OpenSSL server with Firefox using TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (0xc00a) cipher suite

Hi, on https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Security_in_Firefox_2 I found that FF 2 does support only curves with 256, 384, and 521. Maybe this is the same for FF 3 and your 160 bit curve is not supported. Bye Dirk Alex Birkett wrote: > Hi, > > Firefox 3.6.2 supports the TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_2

Re: Size of DH Params

Thank you Dave! Dave Thompson wrote: >> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Dirk Menstermann >> Sent: Wednesday, 10 March, 2010 10:57 > >> when I generate DH parameters with: >> >> int bits = 1024; >> DH *params = DH_generate_parameter

Size of DH Params

Hi, when I generate DH parameters with: int bits = 1024; DH *params = DH_generate_parameters (bits, DH_GENERATOR_5, NULL, NULL); Can I then later read the value of the bits parameter from the DH struct? Thanks Dirk __ OpenSSL Pr

Re: Question to SSL_SESSION

Can anybody help me? Thanks > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: "Dirk Menstermann" > Gesendet: 09.12.09 18:22:46 > An: openssl-users@openssl.org > Betreff: Question to SSL_SESSION > Hello, > > I have a problem with the saving SSL_SESSIO

Question to SSL_SESSION

Hello, I have a problem with the saving SSL_SESSION objects. As there seems to be no SSL_SESSION_dup function I have created one: SSL_SESSION* SSL_SESSION_dup (SSL_SESSION *sslSession) { SSL_SESSION *newSession = (SSL_SESSION *) ASN1_dup ((int(*)(void *in,unsigned char **pp)) i2d_SSL_SE