ite an openssl.cnf file ?
To my mind, the current behaviour (if intended) is at least not obvious in
its intent from the configuration file or (at worst?) bringing in the wrong
information. Or am I missing something obvious here ?
Thanks,
Darren
--
Darren Reed
Hi,
Has anyone done any performance measuring of OpenSSL and published
it on the WWW ? I'm not particularly fussed about hardware (that can
be factored in). I'm interested in measurements of kB/sec encryption
and connections/sec setup/accept for 3DES+MD5.
Darren
___
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Darren Reed)
>
> darrenr> It strikes me as somewhat peculiar that there is little support for
> darrenr> environment variables with the various libraries, in particular to
> darrenr> support debugging.
Whilst investigating what can be done with X-509 certificates, it occurred
to me that maybe having separate, role-based, signing certificates for the
likes of E-Mail/SSL. So I went ahead, created my root (no problems), made
another certificate that was not a CA (but sign-only) and signed that wi
TO try and keep IE all nice and happy, I've included CRL URL's in
some certs I'm generating. For fun (NOT!) I've used different
extensions in the CA cert and the "user" cert:
CA:
X509v3 extensions:
X509v3 CRL Distribution Points:
URI:http://www/myca.crl
Use
