On Wed 2019-02-27 16:02:32 +0100, Christian Heimes wrote:
> In my humble opinion, it's problematic and confusing to use "OpenSSL
> 3.0" for the next major version of OpenSSL and first release of
> OpenSSL with SSL 3.0 support.
Sigh. You're right, but i wish you weren't. :)
Part of the problem of
On Wed 2019-01-09 04:16:05 +, Jordan Brown wrote:
> On 1/8/2019 7:44 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> You could just provide a free-form emergency string parameter that
>> users are advised to not change unless some major advance makes it
>> necessary. At that time, advice can be published as to w
On Fri 2018-11-30 20:38:01 -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> Are there compatibility concerns around changing error message
> text for which users may have created regex patterns in scripts?
I advocate making the error message in english more comprehensible.
Michael Wojcik's suggestion of "Untruste
On Wed 2018-11-28 19:54:34 +, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> On 28/11/18 17:02, Matt Caswell wrote:
>> Please see the following blog post about OpenSSL Versioning and License:
>>
>> https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2018/11/28/version/
>
> :-(
>
> The Apache license is incompatible with GPLv2:
>
>
