RE: Problem with the SHA256 signatures (download files) for the new releases 1.1.1d, 1.0.2t, 1.1.0l etc

2019-09-13 Thread Carl Tietjen
So the https://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-1.0.2t.tar.gz.sha256 file still has the issue. All the other files from the main download page are OK Carl -Original Message- From: Richard Levitte [mailto:levi...@openssl.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 4:41 PM To: Carl Tietjen

RE: Problem with the SHA256 signatures (download files) for the new releases 1.1.1d, 1.0.2t, 1.1.0l etc

2019-09-11 Thread Carl Tietjen
, 2019 2:41 PM To: Michael Wojcik Cc: Carl Tietjen ; Matt Caswell ; openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: Problem with the SHA256 signatures (download files) for the new releases 1.1.1d, 1.0.2t, 1.1.0l etc Issue found... Apache detected .gz in the file name and set the encoding to

RE: Problem with the SHA256 signatures (download files) for the new releases 1.1.1d, 1.0.2t, 1.1.0l etc

2019-09-11 Thread Carl Tietjen
: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Matt Caswell Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 11:10 AM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: Problem with the SHA256 signatures (download files) for the new releases 1.1.1d, 1.0.2t, 1.1.0l etc On 11/09/2019 18:08, Carl

Problem with the SHA256 signatures (download files) for the new releases 1.1.1d, 1.0.2t, 1.1.0l etc

2019-09-11 Thread Carl Tietjen
Hello, >From the download site, https://www.openssl.org/source/ click the SHA256 link >for the new releases. The files do not contain SHA256 hashes. FYI -- The SHA1 hashes seem to be ok -- I only checked one. Thanks, Carl

EC PrivateKey format

2014-10-30 Thread Carl Tietjen
ethod if there is not an old method. Thanks in advance for any help. Carl Tietjen NETIQ