o send "me too"s, but this all mess makes the list
totally unusable for me! ;-(
Bernard
Bernard Dautrevaux
Microprocess Ingenierie
97 bis, rue de Colombes
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Rescorla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 5:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cryptology Questions
>
>
> Bernard Dautrevaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It's even worst t
to each of the documents. Of course, in
> actual applications those assumptions are often not met; but
> simply assuming that colliding pairs of valid documents are
> much harder to find than other collisions is a mistake.
Especially as this is simpler and simpler as computer are fas
t it?
Regards,
Bernard
PS: and please excuse me, but I really can't look at this myself due to
(maily) lack of time ;-(
Bernard Dautrevaux
Microprocess Ingenierie
97 bis, rue de Colombes
92400 COURBEVOIE
FRANCE
Tel:+33 (0
ernard
PS: Although always attracting people, I'm not sure this GPL-compatibility
issue should be discussed at length once more. Perhaps a entry in a FAQ
could just summarize the issue (with mention of the definitive and
authoritative optinion of RMS) with indication to people willing to relea
t from
http://www.wxwindows.org).
HTH
Bernard
Bernard Dautrevaux
Microprocess Ingenierie
97 bis, rue de Colombes
92400 COURBEVOIE
FRANCE
Tel:+33 (0) 1 47 68 80 80
Fax:+33 (0) 1 47 88 97 85
e-m
e rest we had to convert all the test scripts in C programs
(we do not have a bourne shell on the target) and are running (successfully
for now) the tests.
Bernard
Bernard Dautrevaux
Microprocess Ingéniérie
97 bis, rue de Colombes
92400 C
eeding a PRNG to obtain unrelated
sequences (as needed when using montecarlo techniques fro statistical
analysis) and when one need to obtain UNPREDICTABLE sequences. Here we're
talking of the second case; your approach may be valid for the first case
but not at all for cryptographic activities.
HTH
ed with
the other parties if needed, and may be the other party itself (if signing a
simple bilateral contract).
My question is thus: is there such a protocol, and such timestampting
authorities? This role could be assumed by the root CAs or by official time
holding bodies; note that this only need
tures I use; if you wish to continue
using this service you must answer YES at the following dialog"
Then downloads a self-signed certificate... :-( I bet a lot of people, even
moderately aware of what security means, will accept this (especially if it
was better worded :-)) and thus allo
-)
Regards,
Bernard
>
> Hazel
> >
> >
> > Does anyone have the URL for how Netsape and/or MSIE validate or
> > test then accept a CA for inclusion in their web browsers?
> >
Bernard Dautrevaux
Microprocess In
11 matches
Mail list logo
