Building on Windows in 64 bit mode

e-type-x86-conflicts-with-target-machine-typ It looks to me like the 64 bit build is using some components that came out of the 32 bit build, but I am not sure. Regards, Andrew Marlow ___ This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privil

enh rqst for util/mkdir -p.pl

o see mkdir-p.pl check to see if the directory already exists before it tries to create it. Regards, Andrew Marlow There is an emerald here the size of a plover's egg! __ OpenSSL Project

Target functionality for 0.9.8?

released in 0.9.8? The reason I ask is that I am waiting for a performance enhancement to be released that I made for using zlib compression with openSSL. The optimisation avoids repeated mallocs for successive SSL'd compressed packets. Regards, Andrew Marlow There is an emerald here the si

openssl+zlib /MD problem

CRYPTO_malloc_init() as the first line in subroutine main(). Again, no effect. Any ideas? Regards, Andrew Marlow There is an emerald here the size of a plover's egg! __ OpenSSL Project

Re: weird corruption on return from SSL_write

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >On Mon, Jul 21, 2003, Andrew Marlow wrote: >> I am using openssl-0.9.7b on Windoze with the Visual Studio v6 compiler >> and have found a strange problem. [ strange problem snipped ] >Only thing I can immediately think of is that ZLIB might not be co

weird corruption on return from SSL_write

with openSSL? I think there may be some strange sort of interaction between the two dynamic libraries on Windoze. I get no problem on Solaris. Regards, Andrew Marlow There is an emerald here the size of a plover'

Re: RE: more spam

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >At the risk of going *completely* off topic, what is TDMA in this >context? Whoops, I actually meant to say TMDA, which stands for Tagged Message Delivery Agent. See http://tmda.net for details. Regards, Andrew Marlow There is an emerald here the siz

RE: more spam

wner of the list I'd suspend him (with a friendly eMail >warning). You're a harsh man. :-) Regards, Andrew Marlow There is an emerald here the size of a plover's egg! __ OpenSSL Project

ZLIB compression performance improvement

Dear openSSLers, Attached is a performance enhancement to the ZLIB compression facility of openSSL. It uses the deflate API rather than the compress API to avoid repeated mallocs. I would be very interested to hear how people get on with this. It has been tested on Solaris 8 and MS-Windows 2000.

scatter/gather buffers and SSL_write

Are there any plans to offer a scatter/gather version of the SSL_{read,write} interface? Sometimes openSSL is used as a component in a stream and it gets to the openSSL bit and finds a bottleneck where a scatter-gather buffer has to be put into one contigous block so it can call SSL_write. I wonde

Compression: efficiency and protocol negotiation

This post is about two things: 1) I am curious to know if anyone has tried out the performance enhancement I submitted for using ZLIB with openSSL. 2) I would like to know if anything is going to be done about openSSL ignoring the compression byte during the handshake when the protoco

Fwd: openSSL zlib performance enhancement

Below is a patch I sent to Richard but I think he must be on holiday or something because there has been no response yet. I wonder if other openSSL developers would care to try this out. -Andrew Hello Richard, Attached is a tarfile with some minor changes to c_rle.c and c_zlib.c fo

Re: ssltest and on-the-fly ZLIB compression

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >* Andrew Marlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> >> I have done some more investigation and have found that ssltest >> will compress when the TLS1 protocol is explicitly selected. > >I also took a look - it seems the problem is the v23 SSL

Re: ssltest and on-the-fly ZLIB compression

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >In message ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, >15 Jan 2003 17:55:05 +, Andrew Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >apm35> I have received a disappointing response to this query so far. > >Here's a less disappointing one: I'm lo

ssltest and on-the-fly ZLIB compression

This post is about my attempts to discover why the ssltest program does not use compression when -zlib is given on the command line. My openSSL is version 0.9.7 and was built via the command './Configure shared zlib'. I have proved that compression does not occur. I proved it via trace statements i

Re: openSSL 0.9.7 and COMP_{zlib,rle}

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >In message ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, >15 Jan 2003 10:20:46 +, Andrew Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >apm35> I would like to report a bug in openSSL version 0.9.7. >apm35> I cannot get on-the-fly compression to work using >

openSSL 0.9.7 and COMP_{zlib,rle}

SSL_COMP_add_compression_method is all that is needed (i.e no explicit negotiation is needed unlike 0.9.6) but I do not think it is working properly. Regards, Andrew Marlow. __ OpenSSL Project http

shared library not built on linux

yet please? regards, Andrew Marlow. On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 11:44:28AM -0700, Rodney Thayer wrote: > There are other combinations where shared libs don't build. > For example, if you do "./config -d shared" you don't > get shared libraries (RedHat 7.2 Intel). [snip] S