Whew, built finally. Looks like there was a mistake first time..
Ok, all works :)
Thank you !
Andrejs
Andrejs Igumenovs wrote:
Seems I didn't set it properly.. How do I build with 'no-tlsext' ?
Thank you !
Andrejs Igumenovs wrote:
No, 'no-tlsext' opt
Seems I didn't set it properly.. How do I build with 'no-tlsext' ?
Thank you !
Andrejs Igumenovs wrote:
No, 'no-tlsext' option doesn't help..
Dave Thompson wrote:
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Andrejs Igumenovs
Sent: Monday, 03 August,
No, 'no-tlsext' option doesn't help..
Dave Thompson wrote:
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Andrejs Igumenovs
Sent: Monday, 03 August, 2009 07:08
This succeed with "ssleay32.dll v0.9.8.4" and it fails with
"ssleay32.dll v0.9.8.11&quo
j
ava:112)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
==
What could be the reason and where should I dig into ?
Thank you !
Sincerely,
Andrejs Igu
re should I dig into ?
Thank you !
Sincerely,
Andrejs Igumenovs
Software Engineer
Quretec Ltd.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@o
After calling BIO_read() the result is allways the following:
+ buf 0x0012d2cc ""
rc 7
!
Is that correct to use BIO for the 'http' protocol at all ?
Thanks a lot !
Sincerely,
Andrejs Igumenovs
. Then the BIO_read() is called and succeeds with no reasonable data
read (return value is too small).
However the same works with the:
int SSL_write(SSL *ssl,const void *buf,int num);
int SSL_read(SSL *ssl,void *buf,int num);
What could it mean ?
Thank you !
Sincerely,
Andrejs Igumenovs