On 02/05/2024 11:52, Rahul Shukla wrote:
Thank you for the quick reply, Matt !!
Is my understanding correct thatif the buffer is empty and SSL_peek() is
invoked while trying to process more records, only application data gets
placed into that buffer?
Technically, the internal buffer is r
Thank you for the quick reply, Matt !!
Is my understanding correct that if the buffer is empty and SSL_peek() is
invoked while trying to process more records, only application data gets
placed into that buffer?
--Rahul
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 12:33 PM Matt Caswell wrote:
>
>
> On 02/05/2024 06
Hi,
I’d like to give you a heads-up about the release distribution changes
we’re making at OpenSSL. The main source of OpenSSL releases will be
OpenSSL GitHub at https://github.com/openssl/openssl. OpenSSL Source at
https://openssl.org/source/ will remain only for backward compatibility and
will re
On 02/05/2024 06:19, Rahul Shukla wrote:
Hi All,
As per the OpenSSL doc :
/
/
/"SSL_peek_ex() and SSL_peek() are identical to SSL_read_ex() and
SSL_read() respectively except no bytes are actually removed from the
underlying BIO during the read, so that a subsequent call to
SSL_read_ex() or
