On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:42:11AM +0100, Scott Morgan via openssl-users wrote:
> > It seems to me that since commit 417be660e1c BIO_do_accept() has
> > incomplete error handling, "ret" isn't assigned when bind() or listen()
> > fail:
> >
> ..
> >
> > So the function returns the wrong value
First of all, thanks Michael Wojcik for your answer regarding the datasets. I
was able to get it working.
In the meantime I got the whole build done and am working on my tests. One
thing that I noticed recently is a wrong certificate X509 name output that
happens because of the following code sect
om/openssl/openssl/pull/11489
> >>
> >> It will probably be tomorrow before it gets merged.
> >>
> >> Matt
> >>
> >
> > Still saw the problem in openssl-1.1.1-stable-SNAP-20200409 .
>
> The fix was merged earlier today.
>
> Mat
I am trying to implement a bit of Rust / Zenroom (the context is performance
testing on very small devices for DP-3T privacy preserving content tracking[3]):
Rust (i is 0 .. 10)
let mut iv = [0u8; 16];
iv[12..16].copy_from_slice(&i.to_be_bytes());
let mut block = GenericAr
On 08/04/2020 18:06, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 11:47:19AM +0100, Scott Morgan via openssl-users
> wrote:
>
>> Run into an odd issue.
>>
>> Consider the following program, based on the documentation[0], using
>> OpenSSL 1.1.1f
>>
>> abio = BIO_new_accept("");
>>
>>
>> Matt
>>
>
> Still saw the problem in openssl-1.1.1-stable-SNAP-20200409 .
The fix was merged earlier today.
Matt
>
>>
>> On 08/04/2020 07:46, The Doctor wrote:
>>> Error occured while compiling
>>>
>>> in FreeBsd 12
>&g
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 09:26:31AM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
> The fix is already going through review here:
>
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11489
>
> It will probably be tomorrow before it gets merged.
>
> Matt
>
Still saw the problem in openssl-1.
