On 01/10/2019 12:21, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> I'm using the indexfile variant. It seems that the -CA argument
> needs to be the signer of the cert, not the CA for the chain; and
> you cannot give -CA multiple times. So you don't get good OCSP status
> for all elements in the chain:
> $ openssl ocs
On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 08:40 -0700, Neptune wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am in the process of making required changes to migrate our code to
> the
> 1.1.x branch. We are currently using the FIPS Object Module 2.0 and
> eagerly
> await word on the new 3.0 FIPS Object Module, but in the meantime
> there is
>
On 10/10/2019 16:40, Neptune wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am in the process of making required changes to migrate our code to the
> 1.1.x branch. We are currently using the FIPS Object Module 2.0 and eagerly
> await word on the new 3.0 FIPS Object Module, but in the meantime there is
> one issue of conc
Hi all,
I am in the process of making required changes to migrate our code to the
1.1.x branch. We are currently using the FIPS Object Module 2.0 and eagerly
await word on the new 3.0 FIPS Object Module, but in the meantime there is
one issue of concern in our code for which I need some clarificati
On our RHEL7 system I created a local CA. When i try to sign the linux
created csr there is no problem. But trying to sign from Palo Alto or F5
csr's it errors with
The stateOrProvinceName field needed to be the same
> in the CA certificate CA certificate (My Entry) and the request (My Entry)
So
> > The easiest way to obtain the fix is to update to the current head of the
> > 1.1.1. stable branch.
> > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commits/OpenSSL_1_0_1-stable
>
> I think you meant to link to the 1.1.1 branch not 1.0.1!
>
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commits/OpenSSL_1_1_1-st
Hi all,
Glad to report that using the latest 1.1.1 stable build from git, all tests
pass successfully and also my issue with the valgrind issues is resolved.
Many thanks for your prompt help.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Dr. Matthias St. Pierre
Sent: Wednesday 9 October 2019 22:58
T
On 09/10/2019 22:57, Dr. Matthias St. Pierre wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
>> However, when I run the tests there appears to be failures.
>>
>> Extract of the make test output below:
>>
>>
>> ../test/recipes/20-test_enc.t ..
>> Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
>> Failed 1/1
