Re: Reg solaris support for openssl 1.1.1b

2019-03-15 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 3/15/19 1:19 PM, Jakob Bohm via openssl-users wrote: > On 15/03/2019 14:33, Dennis Clarke wrote: >> On 3/15/19 5:38 AM, Matthias St. Pierre wrote: >>> My guess is that your binary is loading the system's shared libraries. >>> To find out whether this is the case, try >>> >>> ldd bin/openssl

Re: Why were edwards curves given distinct key types, aren't they EC keys?

2019-03-15 Thread Nicola
It depends on the way they are defined: Ed25519 and Ed448 are standardized as twisted edward curves, while traditional curves in the EC module are defined in short weirstrass form. The set of parameters describing the curves and their equation form are different: - for Edwards curves you have an e

Re: Why were edwards curves given distinct key types, aren't they EC keys?

2019-03-15 Thread Erwann Abalea via openssl-users
Maybe because EVP_PKEY_EC designates an ECDSA key, that an EdDSA key is not generated the same way (particularly the public part), and that the encodings are different? Cordialement, Erwann Abalea Le 15/03/2019 19:20, « openssl-users au nom de Sam Roberts » a écrit : It seems like they

Why were edwards curves given distinct key types, aren't they EC keys?

2019-03-15 Thread Sam Roberts
It seems like they are EC keys, with specific curve designs, and that also have some algorithms designed specifically for them, like EdDSA -- though it looks like that alg is being generalized to other curve types (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8032#ref-EDDSA2). What about them makes it necessary

Re: Reg solaris support for openssl 1.1.1b

2019-03-15 Thread Jakob Bohm via openssl-users
On 15/03/2019 14:33, Dennis Clarke wrote: On 3/15/19 5:38 AM, Matthias St. Pierre wrote: My guess is that your binary is loading the system's shared libraries. To find out whether this is the case, try     ldd bin/openssl If my assumption is correct, you might have to set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH

RE: Reg solaris support for openssl 1.1.1b

2019-03-15 Thread Ludwig, Mark
> From: Dennis Clarke, Friday, March 15, 2019 8:33 AM > > On 3/15/19 5:38 AM, Matthias St. Pierre wrote: > > My guess is that your binary is loading the system's shared libraries. > > To find out whether this is the case, try > > > >     ldd bin/openssl > > > > If my assumption is correct, you mig

Re: Reg solaris support for openssl 1.1.1b

2019-03-15 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 3/15/19 5:38 AM, Matthias St. Pierre wrote: > My guess is that your binary is loading the system's shared libraries. > To find out whether this is the case, try > >     ldd bin/openssl > > If my assumption is correct, you might have to set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH > explicitely. Actually LD_LIBRAR

Re: How can I make openssl doesn't add a signed attribute "signingTime" when I sign a cms/cades singnature?

2019-03-15 Thread shiyao_...@foxitsoftware.cn
Hello Antonio, Thanks for your answer.So there is no way to not add the "signingTime" attribute? Is there a plan to make the attribute optional in the near future? Regards. Shiyao Liu -- Original -- From: "Antonio Iacono"; Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2019 04:41 PM

Re: Reg solaris support for openssl 1.1.1b

2019-03-15 Thread Matthias St. Pierre
My guess is that your binary is loading the system's shared libraries. To find out whether this is the case, try     ldd bin/openssl If my assumption is correct, you might have to set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH explicitely. HTH, Matthias On 15.03.19 09:43, ramakrushna mishra wrote: Hi, I am tryin

Re: Reg solaris support for openssl 1.1.1b

2019-03-15 Thread ramakrushna mishra
Hi, I am trying to upgrade openssl on solaris machine from 1.1.0e to 1.1.1b. The "uname -a " output from solaris is : > SunOS 5.10 Generic_147147-26 sun4v sparc sun4v > The Configure and installation of openssl was successful. But when i run "bin/openssl version" it fails with following error.