(Resend from correct account)
On 15/02/2019 18:35, Salz, Rich via openssl-users wrote:
(as for "possibly not the FIPS provider", that's exactly right. That
one *will* be a loadable module and nothing else, and will only be
validated as such... meaning that noone can stop you from hacking
around
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 2:18 PM Jakob Bohm via openssl-users <
openssl-users@openssl.org> wrote:
> On 17/02/2019 14:26, Matt Caswell wrote:
> > On 16/02/2019 05:04, Sam Roberts wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 3:35 PM Matt Caswell wrote:
> >>> On 15/02/2019 20:32, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
On 17/02/2019 14:26, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 16/02/2019 05:04, Sam Roberts wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 3:35 PM Matt Caswell wrote:
On 15/02/2019 20:32, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Feb 15, 2019, at 12:11 PM, Sam Roberts wrote:
OpenSSL could delay the actual shutdown until we're about to retu
On 16/02/2019 00:02, Richard Levitte wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 18:33:30 +0100, Lewis Rosenthal wrote:
...
I strongly encourage you to re-think this. Everyone else on this list
whose server has been properly configured to not trash legitimate
messages must now be inconvenienced by the needs of
