Hello everyone,
I’m new at OpenSSL programming and encountered a problem while build TLS
connection. I’m working on a crypto chip ATECC508A. So the client private key
is stored in the chip and no way to get it out. However during standard TLS
handshake, I need to provide client private key by “
Can anyone please help on this? If u need any additional information please
let me know.
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:25 PM Ananthu Unnikrishnan
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Adding more details to the previous mail. We have edited the OpenSSL code
> for implementing the polling for changed fd's as in OpenSS
Dear Bo-Yin Yang,
I looked into your felem_square counterexample:
There is an overflow in the result's least significant 128-bit limb such
that the computed result is 2^128 smaller than the actual result.
The general problem is the following..
The function's comment says:
/*-
* felem_square
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20190107183136.-ew61%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
...
| ...
||RAND_bytes() has always documented that it can fail. Most function
...
|So, to me.., i do not see any possible error condition, since the
|initial seeding has been testified with RAND_status().
|
|This is dif
Jakob Bohm via openssl-users wrote in <07f4dea3-1a62-0c8c-76a4-cbe56abc8\
7...@wisemo.com>:
|On 07/01/2019 22:31, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> Good evening.
|>
|> Jakob Bohm via openssl-users wrote in <95bceb59-b299-015a-f9c2-e2487a699\
|> 8...@wisemo.com>:
|>|Small corrections below:
|>| ...
On 07/01/2019 22:26, Jordan Brown wrote:
[ Off topic for OpenSSL... ]
On 1/7/2019 8:06 AM, Jakob Bohm via openssl-users wrote:
A chroot with no other reason to open /dev/null should not contain that
file name, even on unix-like platforms (least privilege chroot design).
There's always a firs
On 07/01/2019 22:31, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> Good evening.
>
> Jakob Bohm via openssl-users wrote in <95bceb59-b299-015a-f9c2-e2487a699\
> 8...@wisemo.com>:
> |Small corrections below:
> | ...
Note that I do not represent the project at all, I am just another user
trying to help you.
As s
[ Off topic for OpenSSL... ]
On 1/7/2019 8:06 AM, Jakob Bohm via openssl-users wrote:
> A chroot with no other reason to open /dev/null should not contain that
> file name, even on unix-like platforms (least privilege chroot design).
There's always a first reason :-)
But also: /dev/null is par
Good evening.
Jakob Bohm via openssl-users wrote in <95bceb59-b299-015a-f9c2-e2487a699\
8...@wisemo.com>:
|Small corrections below:
|
|On 07/01/2019 19:31, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|
||...
|||RAND_load_file() and all this stuff. Just make sure the os entropy \
|||sources
|||are available an
Small corrections below:
On 07/01/2019 19:31, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
...
|> That is really bad. Of course you had to do it like this, and you
|> surely have looked around to see what servers and other software
|> which use OpenSSL do with the PRNG afte
A wonderful Monday in the beautiful Winter time i wish.
I am sorry for the late reply again, i got a bug report for the
mailer i maintain, and from a long time user.
I hope it is ok that i compress the answers in one message, i am
talking much too much...
Kurt Roeckx wrote in <20190105221506.ga18
>
> On Jan 7, 2019, at 09:20, Chris Fernando via openssl-users
> wrote:
>
> I perused the list archives for all of 2018 and did not see anything current
> relating to this problem, so if this is a question that has been asked &
> answered, please feel free to point me at the relevant location
On 04/01/2019 22:04, Michael Wojcik wrote:
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of
Jordan Brown
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2019 13:16
If you want to, what you want is something like:
int fd;
do {
fd = open("/dev/null", O_RDWR);
I perused the list archives for all of 2018 and did not see anything current
relating to this problem, so if this is a question that has been asked &
answered, please feel free to point me at the relevant location to read about
what I'm doing incorrectly. =)
I'm not at all familiar with Windows
Dear all,
we found some counter-examples (examples where wrong answers were
returned) for field element computations in the C routines for P-521
(that is, modulo 2^521-1). The counterexamples, a C test file, a
Makefile, and a short README are attached.
The routines in question are: felem_s
Hi all,
Adding more details to the previous mail. We have edited the OpenSSL code
for implementing the polling for changed fd's as in OpenSSL speed command.
Attached the code snippet of the same along with this mail.
Mentioned below some observations which found doubtful:
1) We have got prints in
16 matches
Mail list logo
