On 13/09/2018 21:47, Salz, Rich via openssl-users wrote:
Much work for little gain and purpose.
You can mix drafts, but mixing the draft and the official version is hard,
there's too many semantic changes (e.g., around fallback vs
no-fallback-protection).
Ok, from what others had said, the on
Much work for little gain and purpose.
You can mix drafts, but mixing the draft and the official version is hard,
there's too many semantic changes (e.g., around fallback vs
no-fallback-protection).
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/opens
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 08:13:41PM +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> On 13/09/2018 09:57, Klaus Keppler wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >thank you for all your responses.
> >
> >I've just tested with Firefox Nightly 64.0a1, and both s_server and our
> >own app (using OpenSSL 1.1.1-release) are working fine.
> >
> >Th
On 09/13/2018 02:13 PM, Jakob Bohm wrote:
On 13/09/2018 09:57, Klaus Keppler wrote:
Hi,
thank you for all your responses.
I've just tested with Firefox Nightly 64.0a1, and both s_server and our
own app (using OpenSSL 1.1.1-release) are working fine.
The Firefox website is quite confusing:
Fi
On 13/09/2018 09:57, Klaus Keppler wrote:
Hi,
thank you for all your responses.
I've just tested with Firefox Nightly 64.0a1, and both s_server and our
own app (using OpenSSL 1.1.1-release) are working fine.
The Firefox website is quite confusing:
Firefox 61 is already shipping draft-28, whi
On 13/09/2018 03:24, Michael Wojcik wrote:
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
Of Jakob Bohm
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 17:18
Testing your OpenSSL download with the HTTPS security bites its
own tail, especially if your download tool uses an (older) v
Hello !
I'm completely new to openssl, but really need to implement simple application
which will use DTLS over UDP.
Unfortunelly, it seems that all examples which I can find, correctly implement
DTLS server, but not implement DTLS client side.
For example, this one:
https://github.com/nplab/
On 13/09/18 11:23, Cyrus Naliaka via openssl-users wrote:
> 1.1.1 release still has the legacy license.
>
> Should we still expect a license change?
>
It is still our intention to change the license at some point however
issues remain. It is likely to be some while before we are able to do so
1.1.1 release still has the legacy license.
Should we still expect a license change?
Thank you.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, June 25, 2018 5:20 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
> - Do you still plan to switch to Apache license for the final 1.1.1 release?
>
> That is still our goal, as sta
Hi,
thank you for all your responses.
I've just tested with Firefox Nightly 64.0a1, and both s_server and our
own app (using OpenSSL 1.1.1-release) are working fine.
The Firefox website is quite confusing:
> Firefox 61 is already shipping draft-28, which is essentially the same as the
> final
10 matches
Mail list logo