We currently don't have per-engine support of the kind. The cleanest
you can do is probably having a private config looking something like
this:
our %targets = (
'mytarget' => {
inherit_from=> [ 'whatever' ],
dso_ldflags => '-lsomelib'
}
> On Sep 4, 2018, at 12:10 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> My understanding is that you need x and y to do the computation.
> (And I observe this in code)
The Y coordinate is not needed for X25519 and X448 Diffie-Helman key agreement,
these operate on the X (sometimes called "u") coordinate on
Thanks. That is correct. I'd like to specify -lsomellib for just one
engine target in engines/build.info.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 12:12 AM Jakob Bohm wrote:
> On 04/09/2018 08:55, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On 9/3/18 9:05 PM, Thomás Inskip wrote:
> >> Does anyone know how I can specify that a
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> A curve point needs an x and a y. But do you need the y for the
> computation. Do you only need its sign? I don't know. I am not a
> mathematician.
My understanding is that you need x and y to do the computation.
(And I observe this in code)
However, si
You can use a BIO_new( BIO_s_mem() ) to feed the memory through
BIO_writeand PEM_read_bio_X509
something like ...
https://github.com/d3x0r/SACK/blob/master/src/netlib/ssl_layer.c#L780
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 8:07 AM Eli Golosovsky
wrote:
> Is there an option, in *OpenSSL 1.1.1*, to load a CA bu
Is there an option, in *OpenSSL 1.1.1*, to load a CA bundle from memory
(buffer / string) instead of loading it from a file?
>From my experience, loading a CA bundle can be achieved by using the
*X509_STORE_CTX_* functions, on an *X509_STORE_CTX* object, representing
the certificate, and finalizin
With curve25519, the scalar multiplication function:
(x, y) -> n * (x, y) = (x', y') -> x'
has the property that for valid points on the extended curve (degree
two extension of F(p) that gives a y for every x in F(p)), x' depends
only on x, and can be effectively computed from x alone, and this
On 04/09/2018 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
My source is Dr. Lange at the IETF meeting in Toronto when the IETF
selected EC25519.
A curve point needs an x and a y. But do you need the y for the
computation. Do you only need its sign? I don't know. I am not a
mathematician.
I may have m
My source is Dr. Lange at the IETF meeting in Toronto when the IETF
selected EC25519.
A curve point needs an x and a y. But do you need the y for the
computation. Do you only need its sign? I don't know. I am not a
mathematician.
I may have misunderstood her at the time.
On 09/04/2018 1
On 04/09/2018 15:43, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
And I seem to recall that one bit is for compact representation. That
is, is y positive or negative. With p256, you have to transmit x and
y or deal with the compact representation patent.
Not sure if this applies do X25519 and Ed255 which use dif
And I seem to recall that one bit is for compact representation. That
is, is y positive or negative. With p256, you have to transmit x and y
or deal with the compact representation patent.
On 09/04/2018 08:00 AM, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
Probably because the definition of X25519 requires that bits
Probably because the definition of X25519 requires that bits 0, 1, and 2 of
the first byte of the private key are set to 0 before being used, and
OpenSSL counts the number of bits including the highest-order set bit.
(Really, there's an additional 2 bits that are also set to known values:
bit 6 of
Final release is still scheduled for September 11, see also the discussion on
openssl-project
https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-project/2018-September/001010.html
HTH,
Matthias
Von: openssl-users Im Auftrag von Juan Isoza
Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. September 2018 09:09
An: openssl-users@o
On 04/09/2018 08:55, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On 9/3/18 9:05 PM, Thomás Inskip wrote:
Does anyone know how I can specify that a specific shared library (in
this case an engine) is dependent on a system-installed shared
library (i.e. not built along with openssl)?. Basically the
equivalent of LD
Hello,
Have you more info ? regards
Le lun. 27 août 2018 à 15:12, Matt Caswell a écrit :
>
>
> > We are hoping that pre 9 will be the last beta and the next release will
> be the final one.
>
> > We have tentatively discussed 11th September as a possible release date
> - but no definitive decisi
15 matches
Mail list logo
