On 18 July 2018 at 08:36, Ryan Beethe wrote:
> So that makes me nervous about whether or not I am using
> SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list() wrong. Should I be calling it at all? And if
> so, where would I find the "right" setting for other operating systems,
> since "PROFILE=SYSTEM" appears to be Fedora
I am writing a cross-platform C application, which I would like to
release for a variety of operating systems (Windows 7+, MacOS
HighSierra, Debian 8+, Ubuntu 14.04+, Fedora 27+, Centos 7+, ArchLinux,
at least for now).
Up to now, I have had a line of code which prepares an SSL_CTX object
like som
Hello,
You can register a verify callback function using
X509_STORE_set_verify_cb() and X509_verify_cert() will call this
function, which can be used to by-pass targeted errors like
X509_V_ERR_INVALID_PURPOSE etc.
Check callb function from apps/x509.c
Thanks,
Thulasi.
On 16 July 2018 at 20:48
Hello Viktor,
dont worry. Am not trolling.
I take this seriously for my little project.
:)
Greetz.
Val.
Am Di, 17. Jul, 2018 um 2:56 A. M. schrieb Viktor Dukhovni
:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 09:02:38PM +0200, Carl-Valentin Schmitt wrote:
Up to recent time it was that Command passwd involve
On 17/07/18 10:00, Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
> Is there any way that Encrypted Server Name Indication will make the
> 1.1.1 release, or is too late or too experimental?
1.1.1 is frozen for new features, so there is no chance this would be
included.
In any case this is still
Is there any way that Encrypted Server Name Indication will make the
1.1.1 release, or is too late or too experimental?
Angus
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
